Laserfiche WebLink
<br />161 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />in the recerd. I have the feeling that the very. prece,3s here is a process <br /> <br />carriod en under the assumptien that the federal gevernment may have a riV1t <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />te the unapprepriated waters and it has by this method secured their <br /> <br />division. <br /> <br />MR. amELE: That can be very persuasively argued, but it is net at all <br /> <br />cenclusive. It alse can be persuasively arGued to the contrary and it <br /> <br />seems te me there ought te be seme expressien in th5.s compact with certainty <br /> <br />upen that subject so that :it can be intelligently passed upon. <br /> <br />CRlIRI,LU, HOOVER: ~n expression resorving the unappropriated waters <br /> <br />destroys the entire basis and sense and purpose of this whole Celmnission. <br /> <br />1IT1. aDJELE: That weuld be true if the claimant of the unappropriatod <br /> <br />.-rater were some adverse interest, that would bo absolutely truo then, but <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />it is not true when you consider tho relation that tho Unitod states has to <br /> <br />these seven states, as I view it. <br /> <br />.,. <br /> <br />CH.\.IRJ.\AN HOOVER: UOll,. wo havo previded horo for an apportionment. <br /> <br />That apportionment is net yot appropriated. If tho federal goverm:Jent should <br /> <br />intorvene and say that tho unappropriated wator was its possossion and <br /> <br />provinco, it would destrcy this ontiro apportionmont be~1eon thc 7 states <br /> <br />as I vier: it. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />< <br />.. <br />