My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04165
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04165
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:54:02 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:11:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.B
Description
UCRBRIP - Riverine Fish Flow Investigations
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
6/1/2003
Author
CDOW
Title
Riverine Fish Flow Investigations 2003
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />14 <br /> <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />sampling scheme was used as in 2000 except a seventh pass was performed in the mid- <br />river zone. The additional mid- river pass was found necessary to improve the recapture <br />probabilities for large fish mid-channel. The dates and the mean daily flow (Palisade <br />gage) for that day for the period of sampling is given in Table 3. <br /> <br />The Dolores River was electro-fished in July 2000 and 200 I. In both years on the <br />first pass block nets were placed at the downstream end of each run (upstream ofriffies) <br />Also, each run was repetitively electro-fished three to five times. Fish from each pass <br />were held in nets, then marked and released into the same run of capture. This process <br />was continued over the entire reach. Block nets were not used on recapture passes. <br />Dates of electro-fishing and flows from the Slick Rock gage is given in Table 3. <br /> <br />CHANNEL TOPOGRAPID' <br /> <br />Global Positioning Systems and Sonar <br /> <br />In 1999 and 2000, bathymetric surveys of the channel were taken of the six study <br />sites using Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and sonar technology. The channel <br />surveying technique previously described in Anderson and Stewart (2000) was performed <br />from a moving boat. A large amount of bathymetry data was gathered in a short amount <br />of time. The GPS system was a Javad Oddessy LlfL2 RTK GPS with Glonass and Multi- <br />path reduction options turned on. The system had a published vertical accuracy of 15mm <br />+/- 1.5 mm. The sonar unit was an ODOM Hyrographic Systems, Hydrotrac - Single <br />Frequency, Portable Survey Sounder The sonar unit used a 200kHZ frequency with a <br />published accuracy of I cm +/- I % of depth and an output resolution of I cm The sonar <br />unit pinged and logged ten depth readings per second. The RTK GPS logged one <br />position per second. The RTK GPS system output a NMEA GGA string at a rate of 1Hz <br />while the sonar output text strings indicated depth at a rate of 10Hz. Data from these <br />instruments were sent to a laptop computer and recorded using the COMLOG software <br />from ODOM Hydrographic. Because the RTK GPS and Sonar data were received at <br />different rates, all data entries collected by the COMLOG software were time-tagged to <br />the millisecond using the computer's clock. The depth readings immediately before and <br />after the RTK GPS reading were interpolated by the computer clock time (nearest <br />millisecond) to produce the XYZ coordinates used to map bed topography of the river <br />channel <br /> <br />Bathymetric data were collected from longitudinal runs and cross-sectional <br />surveys. Special care was taken to ensure that the transducer and GPS antenna were <br />mounted in such a way as to remain nearly vertical during each run <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.