Laserfiche WebLink
<br />001107 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />to 590 cfs during peak runoff periods. Modeled flows during August and September are often <br />less than 5 cfs. Average annual outflow from the reservoir is approximately 63,000 af, due to <br />annual evaporative losses of roughly 1,400 af. As a note, reported zero flow conditions are, to <br />some degree, an artifact of modeling assumptions. Typically, a minimum of 1 to 2 cfs are <br />present in Elkhead Creek downstream of the reservoir resulting from reservoir seepage and <br />return flow. The seepage component of flow below the reservoir was not represented in the <br />model. <br /> <br />Yampa River - Maybell <br /> <br />Table 4 shows modeled monthly flows of the Yampa River at Maybell under baseline <br />conditions. Figures 6A through 6L present monthly flow exceedance curves based on these <br />modeled flows. Average monthly flows range from a low of 139 cfs in September to a high of <br />. 5,626 cfs during the May runoff period. Occasionally, there are zero flow conditions predicted . <br />by the model at Maybell during the late summer and early fan. However, a minimum of 25 cfs <br />is typically present downstream of the Maybell Canal as a result of leakage around the ditch <br />headgate and return flows to the river. Leakage and return flows from the Maybel1 canal <br />above the Maybell gage were not represented in the model. Table 5 presents the modeled <br />25th, 50th and 75th percentile flows at Mayben for the baseline condition. <br /> <br />Table 5 <br /> <br />Modeled Baseline Flows at Maybell (cfs) <br /> <br />Month <br /> <br />October <br />November <br />December <br />January <br />February <br />March <br />April <br />May <br />June <br />July <br />August <br />September <br /> <br />Post-Project Conditions <br /> <br />25% exc. 50% exc. 75% exc. <br /> <br />312 <br />341 <br />314 <br />277 <br />330 <br />713 <br />3,096 <br />7,005 <br />6,363 <br />1,753 <br />368 <br />191 <br /> <br />229 <br />251 <br />221 <br />211 <br />251 <br />492 <br />2,068 <br />5,754 <br />5,147 <br />999 <br />220 <br />119 <br /> <br />154 <br />207 <br />174 <br />175 <br />231 <br />383 <br />1,368 <br />4,033 <br />3,644 <br />444 <br />91 <br />58 <br /> <br />I, <br />The post-project scenario, I.e. with the Elkhead Reservoir enlargement, was defined in <br />the Hydrosphere model by a projected demand level representing year 2040 conditions and by <br />operation of Elkhead Reservoir enlarged to a capacity of 44,900 af and a primary outlet <br />capacity increased to 655 cfs. The 2040 demand condition includes an additional consumptive <br />demand of approximately 38,000 af over conditions in the baseline scenario. Included in the <br />38,000 af demand increment is approximately 14,000 af of demand associated with future <br />growth in municipal and agricultural water use. The remaining 24,000 af of demand is <br />associated with construction of new thermal electric generation capacity at the Hayden and <br />Craig stations, a new coal-gasification plant, and new mining facilities. In most instances, <br />these future depletions would be expected to occur using existing water diversion facilities and <br />water rights. <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />1._ <br />