My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04128
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04128
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:53:53 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:10:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.106
Description
Animas-La Plata
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
1/1/1999
Title
Correspondence regarding the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />r <br /> <br />i> <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />purpose and need of the project - satisfying the Ute Tribes' claims and providing water for <br />other Indian and non-Indian community water needs in Colorado and New Mexico - within a <br />reasonable time. Nonstructural alternatives that rely heavily on buying land and water are <br />fraught with risk and uncertainty and could take 30 years or longer to implement. <br /> <br />Perhaps surprising to some people is that the study found that the preferred alternative is the <br />practicable alternative least damaging to aquatic resources. Refined Alternative 6, the <br />nonstructural alternative that came closest to meeting the purpose and need test, would have <br />adverse impacts on more than four times as many acres as Refined Alternative 4. The <br />preferred alternative limits average annual depletions to 57,100 acre feet, which satisfies <br />endangered species requirements. It also requires Reclamation to schedule pumping from <br />the Animas River to reduce effects to both the downstream trout fishery and recreational <br />uses. <br /> <br />Also, because it would use all the remaining available storage capacity of Navajo Reservoir, <br />Refined Alternative 6 would be more detrimental to the Navajo Nation and the Jicarilla <br />Apache Tribe. And, because it would involve the acquisition of more than twice as much <br />land and water, Refined Alternative 6 would be far more disruptive to existing irrigated <br />agricultural uses and rural communities in southwest Colorado. <br /> <br />The study found that while the cost of Refined Alternative 4 is slightly higher than the cost <br />of Refined Alternative 6 ($290.6 million versus $273 million), the cost estimate for Refined <br />Alternative 4 is more reliable. Refined Alternative 6 has risks that could add significantly to <br />the cost estimate. <br /> <br />The preferred alternative emerges head and shoulders above the nonstructural alternatives. <br /> <br />Finally, I want to say that moving forward in building the project is the right thing to do. <br />Much has been said by government and environmental organizations about environmental <br />justice. Native American tribes have been the most frequent victims of environmental <br />injustice. For environmental organizations and others who oppose this project, I ask that <br />they consider the environmental injustice that will be perpetrated if this project is not built <br />and the wishes and rights of the Southern Utes and Ute Mountain Utes are not honored. <br />Thank you. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.