My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04111
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04111
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:53:46 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:09:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.09A
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
6/1/1988
Title
Comments re: Glen Canyon Environmental Studies: Executive Review Committee Final Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br />- <br /> <br /> <br />. ORIGINAL. <br />United States Department of the Interior <br /> <br />O~CEOFTHESOUCrrOR <br /> <br />, , <br /> <br />Izrrf'1"K&WOUJifI'AlN a.OIOM <br />sum 6201, nDDAL aUILDINO <br />I Z 5 SOUTH STATZ snJtn <br />SALT LAD crrv.l1TAH 8.P38.1180 <br /> <br />"lId <br /> <br />June 6, 1988 <br /> <br />Memorandum <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />oirector, Bureau of aeclamation, Upper Colorado Region <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />Regional Solicitor, Intermountain Region <br /> <br />Legal Implications of Proposed Changes in Operation of <br />Glen Canyon Dam <br /> <br />Subject: <br /> <br />You have requested our review of and comments on a legal oplnlon <br />issued by the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) concerning <br />the captioned subject. The WAPA opinion concludes, inter alia, <br />that to the extent the proposed changes in operation of the-dam <br />would reduce the generation of power or power revenues, they <br />would be inconsistent with the Colorado River Storage Project <br />Act. This conclusion is based on the assertion that generation <br />of power is a primary purpose of the project, and is paramount to <br />other "subservient" purposes, such as "conservation of the nature <br />and wildlife . . . and recreational use of the water areas <br />. . . ." WAPA opinion at 4. <br /> <br />The WAPA opinion focuses on Section 7 of the colorado River <br />Storage Project Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 105, 43 U,S.C. 5 620f, <br />which directs the secretary to operate Glen Canyon Dam "in <br />conjunction with other Federal powerplants, present and <br />potential, so as to produce the greatest practicable amount of <br />power and energy that can be sold at fi~ power and energy rates <br />. . . ." We note that by use of the word "practicable," the <br />Congress arguably gave the secretary some discretion to operate <br />the dam in consideration of other factors. Further, the Colorado <br />River Basin Project Act of 1968, 82 Stat. 886, 43 U.S.C. S5 lSOl, <br />!! ~, which is mentioned only in passing in a footnote in the <br />WAPA opinion, contains a Congressional declaration of purpose and <br />policy which states in part: <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />This program is declared to be for the purposes, among <br />others, of regulating the flow of the Colorado River: <br />'controlling floods: improving navigation: providing for the <br />storage and delivery of the waters of the Colorado River for <br />reclamation of lands, including supplemental water supplies, <br />and for municipal, industrial"and other beneficial <br />purposes,mprOYing water quality: providing for basic <br />public 0 door recreation facilities: improving conditions <br /> <br /> <br />5~2 <br />-2-- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.