Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6. <br /> <br />Rock Mechanics - No additional data. <br /> <br />''';:'-;:'';' <br /> <br />~~} <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />){.~~~~; <br />;.. -' ~ .-., <br />f~~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />~1f\1 <br />!iIi" 'c' <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />~~F <br /> <br />- <br />~.., <br />~li <br />~<<'f <br />i~~t..n <br /> <br />I <br />!}~ <br />~!.~ <br /> <br />;;-;:: -:;:'~ <br />~~~~;~;i <br />.~<\?;.~ <br /> <br /> <br />0', ',', "~,~, <br />0\ _ , -. I ~I <br />U.A.L... _ '_>, <br /> <br />time of day,.",,<.adings are made also has a def:;;W;jite effect. In no case <br />;-,<_,,;J.} f,;.'-":; <br />has the var""iiHon of t:,e rock s,urface over tl1e' lO-inch length of tile <br />strain gage varied more than aeveral 10 thousandths of an inch and <br />across the cracks rarely more than several thousandths or hundredtils <br />of an inch. These variations are not discernible by tile naked eye. <br /> <br />These minute changes in the, roel: noted on the gage stations "lhen <br />projected over the whole mass of the Bridge becomes a fairly sizable <br />variation. This gives some indication to the processes that helped <br />form and shape the Bridge and will eventually 'cause its destruction. <br />It will be difficult to determine the net amount of maximum flexing <br />in the Bridge because the base points of the triangulation and ele- <br />vation surveys are on rock that vary similar to the Bridge but to <br />SOme lesser degree. <br /> <br />Photogeologv <br /> <br />A photo series covering Rainbow Bridge and Bridge Creek Canyon was <br />taken during each semi-annual field visit. On ~arch '30, 1976 during <br />Status Report Period 1/6, 28 photos ''''ere taken when Lake Pm"ell '",s <br />at elevation 3,664.7; on 8-9 and 10-76 during Period #7,28 photos <br />were taken with the lake at elevation 3,670.0; on January 27, 1976 <br />during I.'eriod 1/8, 28 photos "'ere taken,-1ith the lake at elevation <br />3,652.2; and on 8-3 and 4-77, 30 photos were taken with the lake at <br />elevation 3,648.8. Comparison with earlier sets of the photo <br />series show no physical change in the rock structure. A subtle <br />change noted in the photos is that the high water marks at elevation <br />3',674.93 on July 25, 1975, and 3,672.27 on July 5, 1976 have beco:ae <br />obscure or faded completely except in a few places as the reservoir <br />recedes during the drought. Streambed sediments are noted as making <br />expected slight adjustments as the lake recedes and muds from a <br />flash flood lodged and flushed away. Shifting of cobbles and small <br />boulders along the visitor pathways appear to be a slight but con- <br />tinuing change, and some of these rocks are noted in the photos to <br />reappear on the streambed. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Moisture Rock Samvles - No additional data. <br />- ' <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />Geologic Sections - No additional data. <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />Seismic Monitoring <br /> <br />'On January 28, 1976, the U.S.C.S. was assisted in installing an L.4 <br />Mark I.'roducts vertical seismograph and microwave repeater station <br />about 1 mile west of Rainbow Bridge on a high mesa promontory. The <br />unit relays signals to the U.S.G.S. earthquake center at Golden, <br />Colorado. The one confirmed local occurrence was the rockfall from <br />the canyon wall about 1/2 mile northwest' of Rainbow Bridge on August <br />9, 1976. The rockfall caused a spectacular dust cloud but the quan- <br />tity of rock was relatively small on a regional scale and was a good <br />test of the seismographs sensitivity. <br /> <br />Ecology Environmental Effect <br /> <br />~~K~~~~{1I~~~~$.'" <br /> <br />As the reservoir recedes during the drought, the re-emerging rock surfaces are <br /> <br />3 f~~f~ <br />11!~~~1~~ff;t~~lli~~m!I~Jltii!11~!~!~J~~~!;ff~~~~'i~~rf~jiitfj~l~~lL{~JI~ <br />