Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />00 <br />~ <br /> <br />the preplugging level of about 26,000 tons per year to about 7,000 tons per <br />year. At the end of fiscal year 1985, monitoring of seeps and wells was <br />terminated. Water levels in the observation wells had stabilized, and springs <br />and seeps remained dry or filled with standing water indicating the well plugs <br />remained intact. The estimated cost effectiveness of this reduction is $14 <br />per ton. A planning report concluding the Meeker Dome Unit study was <br />published July 1985. <br /> <br />15. Moapa Valley Unit (USDA) <br /> <br />8) <br /> <br />The project covers a S,aDD-acre irrigated area on Muddy River <br />upstream of Lake Mead. The project includes ir.stal1ation of 17 miles of <br />underground piped delivery system, on-farm water management. and salinity <br />control practices. By reducing overirrigation and excessive deep percolation, <br />it is estimated average annual salt load reductions to the Colorado River <br />system will be 19,200 tons. This unit has met the prerequisite for <br />construction and is awaiting funding. SCS published its report on Moapa <br />Valley in rebruary 1981. <br /> <br />16. Palo Verde Irrigation District (Reclamation and USDA) <br /> <br />The Palo Verde Irrigation District (PVIDI is a privately developed <br />district located in Riverside and Imperial Counties, California. Water for <br />irrigation is diverted from the Colorado River at the Palo Verde Diversion Dam <br />and is conveyed through 253 miles of main canals and laterals to serve <br />approximately 90,000 acres of cultivated land. The irrigation return flows <br />are collected in a 149-mile drainage system and returned to the Colorado <br />River. PVID is downstream of Parker Dam, where the major Colorado River <br />diversions are made to areas impacted by salinity. Control of PVID's return <br />flow would not have the damage reduction impact of other units upstream of <br />Parker Dam. <br /> <br />A record of water and salt budget for PVID since 1951 shows that for <br />most years the return flow carried about 10 percent more salt to the river <br />than was dive~ted form the river. Because the drainage flow is so large <br />(about 500 it Is), no alternative beneficial use for the water has been <br />apparent. Consequently, investigations have focused on ways to minimize the <br />increment of salt load that the drainage carries in excess of the salt load <br />diverted with the irrigation water. <br /> <br />The most recent land brought into production is in the southern end <br />of Palo verde Valley, and drains there collect water with the highest salinity <br />concentrations. This land has been under irrigation tor only 20 to 30 years, <br />a relatively short time in comparison to the irrigation history of the valley <br />which began about 1880. During the 1960's many drains were deepened 5 to 6 <br />feet. This accounts tor a drop in the water table from an average of 5.5 feet <br />in 1957 to 9.5 feet in 1983. <br /> <br />The most recent investigation by Reclamation focused on the possible <br />sources of the incremental increase of salt load, apparently coming primarily <br />from the southern end of the valley. Several new observation wells were <br />completed at various depth intervals. The different hydrostatic heads of the <br />different intervals indicate no evidence of a rising saline ground water flow. <br />Ground water table elevations indicate that saline water is not flowing <br />horizontally into the valley. Electrical conductivity of extracts of <br /> <br />VII-24 <br />