Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Lower Basin over the flows during the filling period (1963-80). Salinity <br />would have been much higher now without these additional releases. <br /> <br />~ <br />---.l <br />0) <br />l--.Jo. <br /> <br />During the initial filling, significant leaching of gypsum (calcium <br />sulfate) was documented at Flaming Gorge [9] and Ruedi Reservoirs[10] and at <br />Lake Mead, [11] but gypsum leaching at Lake Mead and RUedi Reservoir has <br />diminished. Final documentation of the long-term salt leaching at Flaming <br />Gorge Reservoir is part of the ongoing reservoir studies. <br /> <br />In addition to salt leaching, the reservoirs may play an important <br />part in other major factors which influence salinity. There is strong <br />evidence that Flaming Gorge Reservoir and Lake Powell have stored more saline <br />water and routed the less saline spring runoff downstream from 1965 through <br />1980. These more saline waters were subject to bank storage, chemical <br />precipitation, ion exchange, oxidation-reduction, and various biological <br />acti vi ties. <br /> <br />Sedimentation in reservoirs may influence both salinity and the mix <br />of dissolved ions. Suspended sediment which is subject to mechanical <br />degradation in a river environment may continue to release salts and exchange <br />ions (sodium exchanged for calcium); however, once settled out in the <br />reservoir, these salts and ion exchange capabilities may be isolated. <br />Sediment stored in reservoirs may contain salts which would have been released <br />with continued mechanical breakdown in a riverine environment. <br /> <br />Another possible loss of salinity in reservoirs is due to chemical <br />precipitation. This possible loss in salinity was investigated by Reclamation <br />for the two largest storage reservoirs in the Basin, Lakes Powell and Mead. A <br />thermal-hydrodynamics reservoir model, which incorporated chemical equilibria, <br />was applied to each of the two reservoirs. <br /> <br />The estimated potential for calcite precipitation (the salt that <br />precipitates from solution first) was found to be 20,000 tons per year for <br />Lake Powell and 40,000 tons per year for Lake Mead. These estimates represent <br />the upper limit of potential precipitation, as it assumes that there is <br />sufficient nuclei for the calcium carbonate crystallization and that reaction <br />rate kinetics do not limit the precipitation. The combined maximum <br />precipitation is less than 1 percent of the annual salt load passing through <br />the reservoirs and is significantly less than previous estin~tes which were <br />based on inflow-outflow budgets using rather incomplete or inadequate data. <br /> <br />3. Irrigation and Increased Depletions <br /> <br />Most of the irrigation projects that deplete water and increase salt <br />pickup to the river were in place before 1965. Moreover, like the newly <br />inundated soils in reservoirs, newly irrigated lands are subject to a <br />leach-out period. In cases where lands with poor drainage stored salt, these <br />areas were taken out of production. In addition, irrigation practices changed <br />significantly during the 1960-80 period with canal and lateral lining, <br />sprinkling systems, gated pipe, and trickle systems being introduced. These <br />changes should result in reduced return flows and salt pickup. Projected <br />water depletions through the 1965-80 period were largely unrealized; total <br />depletions increased by approximately 12 percent. <br /> <br />Previous Reclamation salinity projections have been too high, <br />largely because the depletion projections were also too high. Transbasin <br /> <br />V-4 <br />