Laserfiche WebLink
<br />these facilities. The conflict stems from the difference in the optimum <br />temperatures for cold water fish like trout and warm water endemic or <br />~ endangered species like the squawfish. <br />~ <br />~, In addition to downstream effects, the depth of withdrawal in <br />~) reservoirs has become a significant issue concerning the productivity of <br />reservoir fisheries, eutrophication, nutrient retention, salinity routing, <br />esthetics, and evaporation. [5] At present, there are concerns about <br />evaporation, temperature, and nutrient processes in Fontenelle and Flaming <br />Gorge Reservoirs, Lake Powell, and Lake Mead. <br /> <br />2. Economic <br /> <br />In the Lower Basin, present peak salinity is approaching critical <br />levels for some salt sensitive crops. While the water is suitable for <br />irrigating most crops, salinity is high enough that special irrigation <br />practices are necessary in some cases. At the present time, salinity is being <br />maintained below the standards. Complete development of apportioned water by <br />the States will result in increases in salinity that would be more detrimental <br />to agriculture without salinity control measures. <br /> <br />A consortium of water resource centers in the States of Arizona, <br />California, colorado, and utah cooperated in a study funded by the Office of <br />Water Research and Technology and the Bureau of Reclamation to assess the <br />economic damages caused by various salt concentrations to agricultural and <br />municipal water users. This study is documented in a report, Salinity <br />Mana ement tions for the Colorado River, Water Resources plannin <br />Serles Report P , June <br /> <br /> <br />Based upon the findings of that report, Reclamation has published a <br />summary working document entitled, Colorado River Salinity--Economic Impacts <br />on A ricultural, Munici 1, and Industrial users.I7] The estimated future <br />annua amages to t e Lower Basln water users 1n 1976 dollars were $343,000 <br />for each I mgjL increase in TDS at Imperial Dam when concentrations reach the <br />range of 875 mglL to 1,225 mg/L. The damage figure is approximately $610,200 <br />per mglL in 1986 dollars. These annual damages were calculated using the 1972 <br />salinity standard of 879 mglL (approved by EPA in 1975) and a projected full <br />development salinity concentration of 1,225 mglL at Imperial Dam. This study <br />is currently being updated, see Part IX, Economic Update to Salinity Impacts, <br />for a summary. <br /> <br />The annual municipal camages are divided as follows: Metropolitan <br />Water District, 54 percent; Central Arizona project, 8 percent; and lower main <br />stem users, 8 percent. Total agriculture annual damages are 30 percent. <br />Industrial impairments and Upper Basin damages were not evaluated. <br /> <br />3. Health <br /> <br />The Environmental Protection Agency. Drinking Water Office, Health <br />Impacts Laboratory sponsored a conference in May 1984 on Inorganics in <br />Drinking water and Cardiovascular Disease. The conference was directed by Dr. <br />Edward Calabrese, one of the original United States researchers in the realm <br />of the health impacts of sodium. It was the study by Drs. Calabrese and <br />Tuthill concerning schoolchildren in two Massachusetts communities that <br />sparked the initiation of many studies around the world. <br /> <br />IV-4 <br /> <br />... <br />