Laserfiche WebLink
<br />t-'" <br />00 <br />l'\j <br />(.;) <br /> <br />C. Salinity projections <br /> <br />Since CRSS predicts future salinity based on a series of years (a trace) <br />from the past, several traces were needed to show what the minimum, maximun, <br />and average salinity might be. In all, 15 individual runs of the model were <br />made to estimate these values. Table VIII-2 on the following page shows a <br />sununary of the CRSS for the Basin. Figure VIII-3 shows the aggregate results <br />of the 15 individual runs at Impedal Dam. The range shown in the figure is <br />by no means the minimum and maximum possible; however, the figure does <br />demonstrate how salinity can vary due to the combined effects of development <br />and the virgin flow of the river. <br /> <br />~ 1200 . <br />~ 1100 . . . <br /> . . . <br /> . . I <br /> I I . . . . <br />tlD . . I . . I <br /> . . . . I I <br /> . . . . . <br />S 1000 . . . . I I I I I <br /> . . . . . I . <br /> . . I I . <br /> . . . <br /> . . . I I I . . <br />"'-' . . . I <br /> . I . I . . . . <br /> 900 I . I . I . . . . . <br />~ . I . I . I · <br /> . . . . I . . <br /> . . I I . . . . . . . . <br /> . <br />11 800 . . I . . . . . . . . . . <br /> . . . . . I . . <br /> ! I . I I <br /> . . . . . . <br />:; . . . . . I . . . <br /> . . . . . . . . <br />700 I . . . . I . . . <br /> . . . I . . <br /> I . . . . . . . <br />rn . . <br /> . . . . . . . . <br /> . I · . . . <br /> 600 <br /> 1980 1990 2000 2010 <br /> <br />Year <br /> <br />Figure VIII-3. Range of mean annual salinity at Imperial Dam (1986-2010). <br /> <br />The general trend in Figure VlII-3 of increasing salinity with time is <br />due to 2 components. The most obvious one is due me increase in development. <br />The increased use of water reduces the dilution of salinity in the river. The <br />less obvious component is the rebounding of the salinity from the abnormally <br />low levels of salinity observed in 1985-86 which were used as the starting <br />point for these projections. At the present level of development, more normal <br />levels of salinity at Imperial Dam would have been in the range of 820 mg/L <br />instead of 607 mg/L. This demonstrates an important aspect of the projections <br />shown in Figure VIII-3, that natural variations in the hydrologic and climatic <br />conditions can have a dramatic impact on the year to year variation in <br />salinity. The figure shows this variation as the scatter in the possible <br />salinity for anyone year in the future. The possible salinity for that year <br />could vary 100 to 200 mg/L on either side of the mean depending on how wet or <br />dry it is. <br /> <br />VIII-4 <br />