My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04061
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04061
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:53:31 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:06:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141
Description
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Date
1/1/1950
Author
US DoI BoR
Title
Initial Development GUNNISON-ARKANSAS PROJECT Roaring Fork Division Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~. ~ .-.. r... <br />..JV II (J <br /> <br />Report of the Regional Director <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Western Slope features <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />41. A system consisting of about 50 miles of canals <br />and tunnels would enable the collection of water from Hunt- <br />er Creek and the Fryingpan River--both tributaries of the <br />Roaring Fork River. The water so collected would be di- <br />verted to the Eastern Slope through the pOtential Fryingpan- <br />Arkansas Tunnel, about six miles in length. Since 1935, the <br />Twin Lakes Reservoir and Canal Company has diverted Western <br />Slope water from the Roaring Fork drainage to its reservoir <br />on the Eastern Slope, The Company has a legal right to di- <br />vert more water than it has diverted to date; but such in- <br />creased diversions would be detrimental to fishery values <br />in the Roaring Fork River and its tributaries above Aspen, <br />In order to preserve those fishery values the project plan <br />includes an extension of the collection system to the South <br />Fork of Hunter Crecl[ and enlargement of other project fa- <br />cilities to permit an exchange of water with the Twin Lakes <br />Company, This plan hinees upon the execution of agreements <br />whereby the company would refrain from certain diversions <br />through its own system whenever the natural flow of the <br />Roarine Fork River falls below a specified minimum in ex- <br />change for an equivalent supply delivered on the Eastern <br />Slope ~~rough project facilities, The cost of these specif- <br />ic facilities and enlargements is estimated at $2,179,000 <br />and is considered economically justifiable by the Fish and <br />Wildlife Service on the basis of resulting benefits, <br /> <br />42, The Aspen Reservoir would be constructed near <br />the town of Aspen to provide replacement water and also <br />to provide water for future use in meeting demands in West- <br />ern Colorado. The reservoir, which would inundate about <br />650 acres and have an active capacity of 28,000 acre-feet, <br />would be created by an earth-fill dam about 90 feet in <br />height, A short supply canal would divert water from Hunt- <br />er Creek to the reservoir. <br /> <br />43, The Aspen Damsite is at an altitude of 8,017 <br />feeto The collection system for the transmountain diver- <br />sion would be entirely above 10,000 feet altitude, The <br />chief construction problems will be the short working sea- <br />son and transportation of materials, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />R <br /> <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.