Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />PRELIMINARY APPRAISAL-LEVEL ANALYSIS (Continued) <br /> <br />to 4.0 mg/L with a cost-effectiveness of about $680,000 per mg/L. A <br /> <br />saline water collection, storage, transportation, and reuse component <br /> <br />could reduce salinity by up to 6.1 mg/L at a cost of about $925,000 per <br /> <br />mg/L. Full development of a canal lining alternative, combined with <br /> <br />on-farm measures, could affect the viability of the saline water collec- <br /> <br />tion and transportation alternative. A combination of these components <br /> <br />is being considered to best meet the CRWQIP goal. <br /> <br />A fish and wildlife coordination report and a wildlife plan are being <br /> <br />prepared. <br /> <br />Assuming Congress authorized construction of the unit in 1985, con- <br /> <br />struction could begin in 1989. <br />The following summary sheet displays the current appraisal-level <br /> <br />analysis of plan components under study. Additional costs which are <br /> <br />currently being evaluated include powerplant modifications which are being <br /> <br />addressed by the facility owners, the need for and costs of pretreatment <br /> <br />facilities, leasing agreements for crossing Ute or Navajo Indian Reservation <br /> <br />lands, and river crossings. <br /> <br />001463 <br /> <br />2 <br />