Laserfiche WebLink
<br />iC;SiWater Quality <br /> <br />Through rhe canals and reservoirs of the State <br />\Vater Project will flow water, the liquid lifeline <br />of California. In anticipation of water delivery <br />along this lifeline, the department must plan to con- <br />trol the growth of algae and to prevent pollution <br />and deterioration of water quality. The manage- <br />ment of our water resources always must be asso- <br />ciated with the management of the quality of these <br />resources if the water provided is to serve its in- <br />tended purposes. <br /> <br />Substantial progress m our program of surface <br />water quality management was made with the <br />completion, in 1962, of the Sacramento River Pol- <br />lution Survey. Conducted with the assistance of <br />the Departments of Fish and Game and Public <br />Health, the Central Valley Regional \Vater Pollu- <br />tion Control Board, and others, this survey will <br />provide the basis to ensure that waters of the Sac- <br />ramento Ri,'er remain suitable for use downstream <br />and for export. Results of the investigation will be <br />published late in 1962 as Bulletin No. III.' <br /> <br />Early in 1961, two bulletins of significanee 111 <br />the field of water quality were issued. The first is <br />. Bulletin No. 81, "Intrusion of Salt \Vater into <br />Ground \Vater Basins of Southern Alameda <br />County," a summary of the findings of a two-year <br />intensive study of salinity problems in ground <br />waters of southern Alameda County. The second <br />is. Bulletin No. 89, "Lower San Joaquin Valley <br />\Vater Quality Investigation." Publication of Bul- <br />letin No. 89 followed a five-year study of the <br />quality of water in the San Joaquin River between <br />the Merced River and the Delta. This investiga- <br />tion was undertaken at the request of three water <br />agencies which divert water for irrigation from <br />the river. The agencies assisted the invcstigation <br />financially. The report summarizes data regarding <br />past and present quality of waters in the northern <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />RECENTLY PlIBLlSHED <br />WATER QIIALlTY STIIDIES <br /> <br />. Bulletin No. 65-57: Quolity of Surface Waters <br />in California, 1957. December 1960. <br /> <br />. Bulletin No. 65-58: Quality of Surface Waters <br />in California, 1958. December 1960. <br /> <br />. Bulletin No. 65-59: Quality af Surface Waters <br />in California, 1959; Part I: Northern and <br />Central California. July 1961. <br /> <br />. Study of Boron in Citrus Packing Plant Waste <br />Discharges, Fresno and Tulare Counties. <br />September 1961. <br /> <br />. Report on Studies of Sea Water Intrusion in <br />Santa Ana Gap, Orange County. April <br />1961. <br /> <br />. Appendixes C, D, and E of Bulletin No. 63: <br />Sea Water Intrusion in Califon\ia. April <br />1960, <br /> <br />San Joaquin Valley and includes an evaluation of <br />factors influencing water quality of the San Joa- <br />quin River. <br /> <br />\'lith the increasing demand for water, the pos- <br />sibility of waste water reclamation takes on added <br />importance.. Bulletin No. 80, "Feasibility of <br />Reclamation of \Vater From \Vastes in the Los <br />Angeles Metropolitan Area," discusses the possi- <br />bility of economically reclaiming as much as 195,- <br />000 acre-feet annually of water now wasting to <br />the sea, <br /> <br />Throughout California the quality of surface <br />waters deteriorated significantly, although tempo- <br />rarily, as a result of a condition of drought during <br />1960 and 1961. During this period concentrations <br />of various mineral constituents and total salts <br />reached the maximum of record at man)' testing <br />stations. Then abundant precipitation earh- in <br />1962 brought about a marked improvement in sur- <br />face water quality. <br />