My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04026
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:53:20 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:05:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.400.10
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agencies - BLM - Report to Congress
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
7/1/1987
Author
BLM
Title
Salinity Control on BLM -Administered Public Lands in the Colorado River Basin - A Report to Congress - July 1987
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.~ <br /> <br />w <br />w Rangeland Management <br />t..:. <br />c.;) Vegetation, including canopy cover, ground cover, and litter, reduces upland soil loss by <br />protecting soil from direct raindrop impact and by reducing surface runoff velocities. <br />Increased sediment production from saline soils will cause increases in salinity <br />contributions to the Colorado River. Vegetation also intercepts rainfall and enhances soil <br />inftltration properties, thus reducing runoff volume and erosion on hillsides and in stream <br />channels. <br /> <br />Riparian vegetation traps sediment from the uplands, reduces stream bank erosion, and <br />provides stability for stream banks. Establishment of riparian vegetation in degraded areas <br />reduces the need for continued structural control and lowers future maintenance costs. <br /> <br />Management of vegetation cover and resultant decreases in sediment yield are accomplished <br />through grazing, land treatment, and structural techniques. <br /> <br />Grazing Techniques. Livestock grazing affects vegetation by influencing species <br />composition, vigor, production, and cover densities. Proper livestock grazing techniques <br />can increase ground cover in most areas. Quantitative relationships between livestock <br />grazing systems and sediment production or salinity have not been fully researched and <br />developed. Thus, it is difficult to accurately predict the effects of different livestock <br />grazing plans on resulting runoff, erosion, and salinity. However, rangeland condition is <br />carefully monitored to evaluate the extent to which management objectives are achieved. <br /> <br />Land Treatment Techniques. Land treatment techniques must be carefully tailored to <br />the site, with topography and soil characteristics dictating treatment types and design. <br />For example, some range sites such as large areas of pinyon-juniper or big sagebrush lack <br />sufficient understory vegetation to provide appropriate ground cover. Livestock grazing <br />has very little influence on these sites and, consequently, it is impossible to improve <br />ground cover through grazing management. These sites may have high potential for <br />increasing ground cover and reducing runoff with mechanical or prescribed bum <br />treatments. <br /> <br />Mechanical land treatments involve soil tillage techniques such as contour furrowing, <br />ripping, and pitting. Tillage is generally applied to increase infiltration volumes. This may <br />be accomplished by increasing inftltration capacities or depression storage (the time <br />available for infIltration) or both. When successful, runoff and erosion can be reduced. <br /> <br />Salinity benefits will be proportional to the amount of salt in the controlled runoff and <br />sediment. If improved soil moisture regimes improve vegetation cover, benefits derived <br />from land treatments may be sustained indefinitely, given compatible subsequent land-use <br />management. If improved cover is not achieved or maintained, benefits from land <br />treatments may be short-lived. <br /> <br />Structural Techniques. Common structural techniques used in managing runoff, <br />sediment, and salt yields include rangeland dikes, retention plugs, retention and detention <br />reservoirs, and gully plugs. Retention and detention structures trap runoff and sediment <br />volumes in accordance with their design capacities. Generally, total runoff retention is <br />required for a structure to effectively control salinity. Gully plugs usually have small <br />retention capacities, but provide salt and sediment control by reducing erosion in active <br />gully systems. <br /> <br />In addition to effectively controlling downstream impacts associated with runoff, erosion, <br />and salinity processes, retention/detention structures may provide local benefits. <br />Reservoirs provide water for livestock and wildlife. Even after fIlling with sediment, they <br />may provide a riparian-like habitat. Gully plugs, when properly located, can cause <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.