My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04006
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:53:13 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:05:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8443
Description
Narrows Unit
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
3/31/1983
Title
News Articles and Press Releases related to the Narrows Unit
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1.. · n ~I <br />.1. v... <br /> <br />~I <br /> <br />Joun'I.1 <br />Sioux City. IA. <br />Cir. 0 70,442 <br /> <br />Jut 31 1983 <br /> <br />UNIVERSAL Press Clipping Bureau <br /> <br />. ".-:.. '. " /'-1. <br /> <br />A"6-The Sioux City Journal, Sunday, July 31, 1983 . , <br /> <br />Bt1gelllauds.O'NeiIldalll setback <br /> <br /> <br />WASHINGTON - U.S. Rep. Berkley against the project since 1917, said he of whlcb Is already Irrigated tbrough <br />B.edell, D-Iowa, Saturday praised COD- . supported f:he study and hoped It would .prlvate development:'In the process, <br />gressional aclloD to require a study of lead to a less costly, less damaging and almost 30,000 acres of }.and would be <br />alternatlve3 to the O'Nelll .water 1n1ga:" more efficient al~rnat1ve. flooded. 'I:he project carries an esUmated <br />tlon project. . "Tbls project, as originally proposed, price tag 01 more than $360 mWlon. <br />The action was on part of the 1983' is unnessary and expensive:' BedeU said. Ib December,. the House voted, by a <br />Supplemental Appropriations bill whlcb ."1 applaud the conlerence committee lor, lDO-vote margin, to delete lurther lundLqg <br />dIrects the Secretary 01 lbe Intertor, In tbls action and 1 tblnk It's time tbe lor lbe project. However, that vote was <br />co:QjuncUon with the State of Nebraska, project's proponents recognize that the _overturned In 8 conference commUtee <br />to conduct an IS-month study.of bandwritlng Is on lhe wall. The original wblcb relnstated the funds. <br />alt.ernatives "to the orlglnsl O"Nelll project, as it was envisioned, will not be "I was pleased tbat we were abJe to <br />project. Tbe legislation, wblcb Is buUl." , . convince lbe House at that lime to delete <br />expected to -be approved by Congress' The O,'NeW project Involves lbe con- lunds," Bedell said. "Tbls project does <br />berore U adjourns for tbe August recess, strucUon of a dam on the Niobrara River Dot make sense and I'm glad we've been <br />places a moratorium on constructlo.ll..for in north central Nebraska and construe- able to. persuade otber'members at <br />the project unW tbe study Is completed. lion of a 28-mUe, diversion. canal to Congress to oppose this pork-barrel <br />Bedell, wbo bas been leading a lIl!bt dellver water to 77,000 seres 01 land, ball spendlng.'" <br /> <br />c-14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.