Laserfiche WebLink
<br />UP I Wyoming State T,ibun. <br />es Cheyenne. Wyo. <br />Cir.O 11.651 "\,.... <br />liSo <br /> <br />AUG 8 1983 <br /> <br />UNIVERSAL P,essClipping Bureau <br /> <br />--... .---.--- ...---- --- <br /> <br />Wallop Measure Would <br />P~o,t7,~t W.ofer Rights <br /> <br />Sen. Malcolm Wallop threat It offers to wildlife In He said his proposed leg- <br />said today he plans to Inlro- ' Nehraska. (Slatlon woul4 amend the <br />r duce a bill designed to pro- U.S. District Judge John Clean Water Act which <br />tect state water rigbts and L. Kane Jr. of Colorado re- formed the basb for the <br />overturn a federal court de- cent!y held the Army Corps Corps of Engineers so- <br />c!sion preventing the con- of ,Engineers was acting called Section (04 permit <br />structlon 'of' a reservoir on within its legal rights In de- ruling and on which Judge' <br />tlle South Platte River In nying a construction per- Kane based his decision. <br />Coloradn . because of a mlt for the reoprVA'.' The federal gency said It <br />planned on a ,tributary of would grant the 'D4 permit <br />the South Platte In north- only If, tI;le Irrigalton dl5- <br />eastern Colorado. trIct agreed to put back <br />Into the river all or part of <br />the water It plans to with- <br />draw for the stream to fill <br />the reservoir. It said the <br />conditions were neces&Ory <br />to prevent a reduced now <br />of water In the' South <br />PIa tte. <br /> <br />But Riverside &old that <br />such conditions were cont. <br />rary to the Intent of Con- <br />gress which hsd passed a <br />Wallop-sponsored amend- <br />ment to the Clean Water <br />Act six years saying that <br />nothing In tbe act "sball be <br />construed to supersede or <br />abrogate rights to quanti- <br />tltes of water which have <br />been established by any <br />state." <br /> <br />, The reservoir Is a project <br />of the Public Service Com- <br />pany of Colorado and the <br />Riverside irrigation Dis- <br />trict nf Colorado which <br />plan to jointly construct <br />and use its water 'or farm- <br />ing and for suPPlJ'ing a <br />coal-fired electric power <br />genera ting plant near <br />Brush. <br /> <br />The Corp. of Engineers <br />had held that building the <br />reservoir would have ad- <br />verse effects on wildlife In <br />Nebrash, specifically the <br />whooping crane migration <br />nesting grounds along the <br />PlaUe In centramebraska. <br /> <br />"The dam and re3l>rrolr <br />are ,upland; away from the <br />river, and there are no alle- <br />gations by any partu that <br />" <br />construction of the dam or <br />reservoir will have any sig- <br />nificant adverse effect on <br />water' quality, wetlands, <br />fish and wildlife or endan- <br />gered species," Wallop <br />said. <br /> <br />"However, If this deci- <br />sion Is aUowed to stand, It <br />will do serious violence to <br />the entire system of stat~ <br />laws which has been estab- <br />lished to allocate quantities <br />of water," he said." <br /> <br />Judge Kane held that the <br />amendment was only an <br />expreslon of congressional <br />policy and did not take <br />away a state's water right, <br />but only told the irrigation <br />district how It might exer- <br />cise that right. <br /> <br />C-"3Z <br /> <br />"TbiJ Is the fatal naw In <br />what Is otherwise a well. <br />ressoned decision," Wallop <br />uld today. "In fact, the <br />only option that the irriga- <br />tion district and the PSC <br />have Is to put back Into the <br />river a quantity of water <br />equal to all or a portion of <br />the quantity which they are <br />eotitled to use under their <br />state peremlL It is clear <br />that such a requirement at- <br />tempts to supersede a right <br />to a quantity of water <br />whlch has been established <br />by the laws of the State of <br />Colorado." <br /> <br />, <br />