Laserfiche WebLink
<br />t.t) <br />o <br />N <br />en <br /> <br />by Drs. R. A. Young, W. T. Franklin, and K. C, Nobe, <br />is titled "Assessing Economic Effects of Salinity on <br />Irrigated Agriculture in the Colorado River Basin: <br />Agronomic and Economic Considerations," (1973) <br /> <br /> <br />CHAPTER III. ECONOMIC AND OTHER ANALYTIC STUDIES <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Special studies, investigations, and analyses have been <br />conducted and are continuing relative to the quality <br />improvement program. These include economic studies <br />of damages, benefits, and costs; project evaluation <br />methodology; cost sharing; and cost allocation, with <br />particular regard to equity considerations. <br /> <br />Investigations are being conducted by using <br />mathematical models to simulate salt loadings at <br />various points in the surface water system and to <br />simulate both water quantity and quality and the <br />interaction of sur1ace and ground water. <br /> <br />Institutional aspects are being examined, including <br />international treaties, interstate compacts, court <br />decisions, State water law, and water and power <br />contracts. <br /> <br />ECONOMIC STUDIES <br /> <br />Increases in salinity levels produce adverse physical <br />effects on some water users. These effects result in <br />direct economic impacts on water users and indirect <br />economic impacts on the regional economy. Salinity is <br />thus an economic problem. In the Colorado River <br />Basin, the economic effects are primarily limited to <br />agricultural, municipal, and industrial uses and include <br />decreased crop yields, increased leaching water <br />re qui rements and management costs, increased <br />municipal and industrial water treatment costs, <br />accelerated pipe corrosion and appliance wear, and <br />decreased palatability of drinking water. <br /> <br />Large expenditures of funds would be necessary to <br />control the salinity ievel of the streamflows. Costs and <br />benefits must be ascertained to determine the <br />economic feasibility of salinity controls including <br />individual salinity control projects. <br /> <br />The benefits calculated relate to the economic impact <br />of doing nothing. Whereas the EPA studies related <br />benefits to reduction in salt loading at Hoover Dam, <br />the studies described here relate benefits to reductions <br />in salt loading at Imperial Dam. <br /> <br />CONTRACTED ECONOMIC STUDY <br /> <br />I nvestigators at Colorado State University performed <br />contractual research in the economics of salinity <br />relative to irrigated agriculture. The report, authored_ <br /> <br />'The overall objective of the research was to derive the <br />most appropriate procedure for evaluating the <br />economic effects on irrigated agriculture of salinity in <br />the flows of the Colorado River. The study included a <br />review of literature and existing data to ascertain the <br />level of accomplishment in measuring adverse effects of <br />salinity. <br /> <br />The investigations revealed that the most <br />comprehensive study of salinity damage estimation for <br />the Colorado River Basin has been that of the <br />Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The major <br />conclusion drawn was that the EPA estimates <br />significantly understate the damage of salinity <br />increases. Further work is underway on this subject. <br /> <br />PROGRAM STAFF STUDIES <br /> <br />Significant economic studies are being conducted by <br />the program staff and several cooperating universities. <br />The studies involve concepts and methodology related <br />to external project effects, evaluation, cost sharing, <br />cost allocation with particular regard to equity, and <br />more accurate accounting for salinity effects. <br /> <br />Only tentative and preliminary findings on these <br />subjects have been made so far. Various concepts and <br />evaluation techniques are being tested and sharpened. <br />Perhaps the most difficult aspect of the studies involves <br />equity considerations to determine the entities that <br />should provide and pay for controls and to what <br />degree. rraditional cost-sharing policy does not appear <br />adequate for the situation. It is necessary to consider <br />the changing economic conditions of the 1970's, the <br />implications of recent Federal water resource statutes <br />and programs, anticipated new water uses, and the <br />potential energy developments in the area. Also, it is <br />apparent that there must be a much closer accord than <br />in the past among entities and activities imposing <br />salinity costs on the system, the distribution of <br />benefits and beneficiaries of control over time and <br />place, and the assignment of payment responsibility. <br /> <br />ESTIMATES OF ECONOMIC DAMAGES <br />AND BENEFITS <br /> <br />Damages from salinity increases in the Colorado River <br />Basin involve primarily agricultural, municipal, and <br /> <br />29 <br />