Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,...\l <br />0, . <br /> <br />l\:) <br />c.,) <br />r-:. <br />~ <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />The Colorado "River Basin encompasses portions of seven States: Colorado, <br />Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, New Mexico, California, and Arizona. The river is <br />1,400 miles long, with its headwaters in Wyoming and Colorado. It <br />empties into the Gulf of California and serves some 14.5 million people <br />on its way. It is one of the most physically developed and regulated <br />rivers in the Nation. <br /> <br />The river flow is apportioned among Upper and Lower Basin states and the <br />Republic of Mexico. There are some 2.6 million acres of private <br />irrigated land and some 44 million acres of nonfederal forest and <br />rangeland within the United states (U.S.) portion of the basin. <br /> <br />Salinity control in the Colorado River Basin is addressed in the Colorado <br />River Basin Salinity Control Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-320). The <br />Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior (USDI) is <br />assigned leadership responsibilities which he has delegated to the Water <br />and Power Resources Service (WPRS) of that Department. The United States <br />Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency <br />(EPA) are named as cooperating" agencies. The Act has two major <br />components. One is to deliver to Mexico the quantity of water agreed to <br />in 1944 at the quality standard agreed to in 1973. This is covered in <br />Title I of the Act which includes a large desalting plant to treat <br />drainage return flows from the nellton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage <br />District near Yuma, Arizona. The second component deals with the <br />salinity concentration in the River aoove Imperial Dam and the controls <br />necessary to meet U.S. water quality standards. This is covered in <br />Title II of the Act. <br /> <br />The Salinity Problem <br /> <br />The salinity of the water delivered to Mexico increased to nearly <br />1500 milligrams per liter (mgfl) in 1961. This was partially due to the <br />highly saline drainage return flows from the Well ton-Mohawk area. <br />Title I of the Act deals with this problem. <br /> <br />The total salt load in the river at Imperial Dam near Yuma, Arizona, is <br />estimated to be 10 million tons per year. To meet the salinity control <br />objective of Title II, it is necessary to remove some 2.8 million tons <br />per year of this salt load. The present average annual salinity <br />concentration of the river varies from about 50 mgfl in the headwaters to <br />about 820 mgfl at Imperial Dam. A future salinity level of 1,150 mgfl at <br />Imperial Dam is projected for the year 2000 as additional upstream <br />development takes place, assuming no corrective action. The long-term <br />average annual salinity concentration at Imperial Dam was 757 mgfl for <br />the 1941-1970 period. Each mgfl increase in salinity concentration <br />causes approximately $0.5 million per year in economic damages to <br />downstream agricultural, municipal, and industrial water users within t~e <br />U.S. <br />