Laserfiche WebLink
<br />11 <br /> <br />c), <br /> <br />Iw4 <br />to,J <br />tl:) <br />~ <br /> <br />100,000 af/yr) which results in Mexico delivering water into its <br /> <br /> <br />Alamo Canal with a salinity of around 950 ppm. These actions are <br /> <br /> <br />incorporated in Minute 241, which became effective on July 14, 1972, <br /> <br /> <br />and are to remain in effect until December 31, 1972. Minute 218 <br /> <br /> <br />was terminated when Minute 241 became effective. <br /> <br />It is worth examining for a moment the Mexican position that <br /> <br />they should receive the same quality of water as that at Imperial <br />Dam. Presently, more than 500,000 af/yr of the water delivered to <br />Mexico under the 1944 Treaty is derived from return flows below <br />Imperial Dam. The Wellton-Mohawk Project furnishes approximately <br />220,000 af/yr, and the balance comes from other United States <br />projects, including the delivery of drainage water at the southerly <br />international boundary. All Colorado River water above the 1.5 maf/yr <br />Treaty obligation to Mexico is committed to use within the United <br />States. To provide Mexico water of Imperial Dam quality would <br />either require the conveyance of all return flows below Imperial Dam <br />to the Gulf of California and the substitution therefor of Colorado <br /> <br />River water (to the detriment of United States users), or would <br /> <br /> <br />require a major augmentation of the river or a massive desalting <br /> <br /> <br />effort. Desalting of 500,000 af/yr is estimated to cost in the <br /> <br /> <br />order of $25 to $50 million a year. Desalting would leave a brine <br /> <br /> <br />disposal problem of at least 50,000 af/yr. <br /> <br />Maior Outstanding Issues with Mexico <br /> <br />There are two basic issues with Mexico: (1) Does Mexico have <br /> <br /> <br />to receive return flows below Imperial Dam under the 1944 treaty? <br /> <br />I <br />