Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />'COLORADO RIVER STORAGE ~ROJECT <br />PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW MEXICO <br /> <br />SUMMARY OF TRANSMISSION AND INTERCONNECTION ARRANGEMENTS <br />The Public Service Co. of New Mexico in its initial wheeling proposal, <br />which was rejected by the Department, offered to wheel from the <br />Farmington area to Albuquerque for a charge of 1,25 mills per kilo- <br />watt-hour or $6 per kilowatt-year. <br />Under a pro~osal submitted February 9, 1962, the company would <br />dedicate 140 megawatts of transmission capacity to wheeling of Colo- <br />rado Riyer storage project or other power as desired by the Bureau <br />over its 230-kllovolt transmission system from the Farmington area <br />to Albuquerqu~ and to Ambrosia Lake, the first line of which will be <br />in service in 1963, This line is routed through the Affibrosia Lake area <br />and there will:be a 230-115-kilovolt substation on the line to make <br />deliveries to company and Colorado. River storage project customers <br />in that area. . The company will deliver a portion of the 140,000 <br />kilowatts, to Oolorado River storage project customers who desire <br />service in that'area. ' <br />When wheeling capacity in excess of 140,000 kilowatts is ne.eded bv <br />the Colorado J:Uver storage l'roject, the Bureau of Reclamation will <br />then construct, a 230-kiIovolt line from the Farmington area .to AI. <br />buquerque and itsJine will be operated jointly thereafter with those <br />of the compnay to service the loads of both parties in the Ambrosia <br />Lake and Albuquerque areas, On the basis of present projections of <br />load growth, this will occur in 1969, and by 1973 the load would reach <br />190,000 kilowatts. . <br />During the interim period, the company's wheeling charge would be <br />0.7 mills per ki)owatt-hour with a minimum annual charge of not less <br />than $300,000.. Upon initiation of joint operation, the interim period <br />terminates and all charges for wheeling will be discontinued, Esti- <br />mates indicate'the total wheeling costs will vary from the minimum <br />of $300',000 in, the first 2 years to a maximum of about $515,000 <br />when the 140,OOO-kilowatt limit on transmission capacit~ is reached. <br />The temporary postponement of Federal construction will result in a <br />savings in transmission costs of about $100,000 annually during the <br />power payout .period for the storage project, with a corresponding <br />mcrease in the basin fund, . <br />In addition, :the long-range advantages of joint operation are the <br />dependability of a multiline system and savings in losses. In addi- <br />tion, the compl\ny's proposal for joint operation provides for deliveries <br />at Ambrosia L~ke, which is a real advantage to the preference cus- <br />tomers withou~ additional cost to the,m or the storage project, <br /> <br />~, <br /> <br />'lVt', <br />PACIFIC POWER &LIGHr CO. <br /> <br />SUMMARY OF TRAN8M~SSION INTERCqNNECTION ARRANGEMENTS <br /> <br />Pacific Power & Vght Co. offered in its initial proposal of April <br />1960, which was rejected by the Department, to. construct trans- <br />mission lines into the Flaming Gorge powerplant and deliver Oolorado <br />River storage project power to preference customers fqr.a cilarge of <br />I-mill per kilowatt-hour.. . <br />