My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03924
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03924
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:52:50 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:02:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.300.11
Description
San Juan River Recovery Program - Coordination Committee
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
8/24/1997
Title
Natural Flow Update
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />l"\ ,,-,..), .") <br />,loof,. \:J . l.,. <br /> <br />gage. The largest difference here is in irrigation. The acres difference is 1655 acres served from <br />the Pine but which reside in the Florida drainage. Colorado accounts for these acres in the Pine <br />River at LaBoca gage. But even accounting for the 1655 acres, the average annual CU rates are <br />different. BOR at about 1.45af/ac, while Colorado is about 1.23 af/ac. Reservoir evap, including <br />stock ponds accounts for the next biggest difference. <br /> <br />San Juan River at Farmington BOR average annual (1075-91) Natural Flow is about <br />50,300af (2.46%) less than Colorado's base flows, The average monthly differences continue to <br />increase as we work downstream, July, August and September are the largest % differences, <br />Reservoir evaporation and irrigation depletions contribute to our major differences. <br /> <br />LaPlata River at Stateline BOR average annual (1075-91) Natural Flow is about 17,lOOaf <br />(39.2%) ~ than Colorado's base flows. This station has the largest average monthly <br />differences. The major factor here is CU rates. BOR uses 1.23 af/ac, while Colorado is at 0,62 <br />af/ac, Ray thinks BOR is ignoring the Interstate Compact. Could be. NOTE: CU work done for <br />the Animas-LaPlata Project estimated historic (1929-89) Colorado use at about 0.56 af/ac using <br />inpart historic ditch diversion records.. <br /> <br />San Juan At Bluff, DT BOR average annual (1075-91) Natural Flow is about 7l,600af <br />(3.21 %) m than Colorado's base flows. Average monthly difference vary from 1% to -10.5%. <br />BOR natural flows for this comparison were adjusted to match Colorado's analysis by taking <br />Arizona and Utah impacts out of the equation. <br /> <br />********************************************** <br /> <br />Unless people have other ideas, the only place I see for BOR to refine numbers is in CU rates. <br />We are possibly low in the Upper San Juan reaches because of forced shortages from the Type I <br />Study, and we are probably low in the LaPlata River drainage because of the Interstate Compact <br />(backed-up by the ALP study). Colorado's reservoir evaporations are so different from BOR's, it <br />would seem something is wrong there and could use some scrutiny. <br /> <br />As for monthly variations, the Upper San Juan will be controlled by Navajo Reservoir; and the <br />Animas River, the major downstream tributary, has one of the best monthly comparisons with <br />Colorado. It would seem to me we are ready to begin the next step. <br /> <br />John Simons <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.