Laserfiche WebLink
<br />f) r- " " <br />... v lid <br /> <br />Natural Flow Update <br />8/24/97 <br /> <br />1. Colorado <br /> <br />a. Resolution of GIS acres differences (for the most part). Reclamation quantifies acres <br />by watershed units while Colorado quantities by diversion acres at a point. Therefore, we <br />sometimes'have difficulty comparing data at a gage. For RiverWare model, we split diversions <br />into subunits called huc combinations that are equivalent to natural flow sub pieces. Our <br />headgate acres are always same as Colorado's. We created dummy diversions to always match <br />natural flow acres. <br /> <br />b. Darrell used Colorado's pasture acres and Colorado Ag Stat acres for cropping <br />patterns to obtain annual cropping pattern and acres. 2 additional subunits were created to <br />facilitate modeling. Type I shortage cutoffs were applied and Blaney-Criddle was rerun for all <br />subunits for all years (previous analysis had cu&l data prior to 1986). All areas are shorted <br />except units SB (Spring Creek), 6B (upstream of Durango), and Montezuma 203, <br /> <br />c. Cascade reservoir was modeled. Evaporation was computed using prorated <br />evaporation coefficients and generated area-capacity table. Cascasde evaporation was backed <br />out of small reservoir evaporation which necessitated redistributing small reservoir evaporation. <br /> <br />2. New Mexico <br /> <br />a. Obtained revised acres and cropping patterns from New Mexico for all subunits, <br />excluding NllP. Additional acres were added to account for lawns around Farmington that were <br />orginally cultivated fields; NIIP acres and cropping patterns were obtained from Kellner- <br />Blishner. Subunits 3, S, and 6 were subdivided into 3A, 3B, SA, SB, 6A, and 6B where A's <br />correspond to non NIIP lands and B's correspond to NllP lands. Blaney-Criddle was rerun for <br />all subunits. <br /> <br />3. Checking utilities were made more sophisticated to lesson data chasing. A macro library was <br />created to automatically revise all links, recompute correlations, and recompute gains. <br /> <br />Remaining differences between Colorado and Reclamation appear to be to due to small reservoir <br />evaporation and subbasins diversions (due to differences in acres at a given location). Models <br />have revalidated to 'Farmington (Lower Juan and McElmo remain). Consildated model to <br />Navajo Dam has been created. <br /> <br />Following pages are acres and non irrigation depletions summaries sheets used to check model <br />mapping. <br />