Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />-. <br /> <br />'("i" <br />t <br /> <br />" . <br /> <br />-47- <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />[l]nvestlgatlon and establIshment of water <br />rights In accordance with local custom, <br />laws, and decisIons of courts, Including <br />the acquisItIon of water rights or of <br />lands or Interests In lands or rlghts- <br />of-way for use and protectIon of water <br />rights necessary or beneficial In the <br />admInIstration and public use of the <br />national parks and monuments,~QI <br /> <br />I do not view the 1946 Act as InconsIstent wIth the princIple that. when <br />park lands were set aside, the Congress also Intended to reserve the <br />unappropriated waters appurtenant to such lands necessary to accompl Ish <br />park purposes. The reference to establIshIng water rights In accord- <br />ance with court decisIons should be read to Include authorIty to estab- <br />lish reserved water rights under applIcable Supreme Court decIsions. <br />The 1946 Act grants discretionary authority 911 to the NPS to obtaIn <br />water In compl lance wIth state law and to purchase valId, existIng <br />water rIghts, when It' Is In the government's best Interest to do so <br />(e.g., If there are not sufficient c:mounts of unapproprIated water <br />avaIlable to fulfIll park purposes when a park Is cstc:bllshedl. I also <br />view this statute, as apparently does the Supreme Court In the New Mexlc9 <br />case, ~:~. at 702. as authorizing the NPS to acquIre water rights <br />to carry out sec~~~ uses which may be permitted In park areas, but <br />are by definItion not among the purposes for which the parks are created. <br />These conclusIons are compatible with the pro~lslon's scant. legislatIve <br />history. <br /> <br />:.:;.~ <br /> <br />901 This provisIon was Intended to clarify the Service's basic authority <br />to InvestIgate. establ Ish. and acquire water rIghts. so as to avoid points <br />of order to appropriatIon bl I Is. H.R. Rep. No. 2459. 79th Cong.. 2d Sess. <br />2 (1946). When originally Introduced. this provisIon contained no <br />reference to state or local law. The reference was added. however. at <br />the suggestion of the COmmittee on Public Lands. 92 COng. Rec. 9103 <br />(1946). There was no discussion of the underlying reason or need for this <br />amendment on the House floor or In the House COmmittee Report. <br /> <br />~I The 1946 Act Is readily dlstlngulshc:ble from sectIon 8 of the <br />Reclamation Act of 1902. 32 Stat. 390. as amended. 43 U.S.C. 5 383 <br />(1970). construed In California v. United States. supra. to requIre <br />federal deference to both substantive and procedural state water laws <br />for the appropriation and distribution of federal reclamation project <br />water, except where Inconsistent with congressIonal dIrectives. <br />Section 8 provIdes: <br /> <br />.,.c.'". <br /> <br />[ footnote <br /> <br />[N]othlng In this Act sha! I be construed <br />as affecting or Intended to affect or to <br />In any way Interfere with the laws of any <br />continued] <br />