Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ fi if' ~ ~ 1 <br />~.' ~, _,.. .... A. ..,. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />seek management ijprovement measures as a means of extending the utility <br />of present SUPPlijS as well as in the acquisition of new supplies. A <br />large-scale, caPilal-intensive developmental strategy may not harmonize <br />I <br />with this viewPoi1nt. The important consideration of integrating the <br />large-scale Syst~ with local supply options and fiscal constraints has <br />been given too little consideration in the past. <br />Water rights issues have seldom involved water quality constraints, <br />but th,y probably ~ill in the future. How could basinwide water manage- <br />ment contribute Ito improving qual ity for some water requirements, <br />where quality is rucial? Management options in this regard may offer <br />consid,rable oppor unities for substantial economic gain. Beneficiaries <br />might be able and willing to pay the cost of certain management changes <br />to maintain and im rove water quality. <br /> <br />Groundwater echarge for storage and later recovery over several <br />years Qught to. be I given strong emphasis in the future. Strategies for <br />implementing rechfrge at the most efficient and effective locations <br />with respect to Iconjunctive surface-groundwater management ought to <br />be investiga ted; I <br />I <br />These issues1 along with some broader management questions, are <br />discussed in greattr detail in Chapter V. <br />1.5 P~emises I <br />In designing this study, various projections of the future operating <br />climate were necestary. Projections made by the study team included the <br />fo 11 owiing : I <br />(a) The Fed ral Government is not expected to try to solve most <br />water pl nning problems in the future. <br /> <br />.''1/ <br /> <br />'. ,," <br />b' "~~"'i ~ db ,i~~i.':lg <br />