My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03894
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03894
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:52:42 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:01:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8281.950
Description
Colorado River Studies and Investigations -- Upper Colorado Comprehensive Framework Study
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/1/1971
Title
Upper Colorado Region Comprehensive Framework Study - Main Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />o <br />(-"-) <br />':~.J <br />~ <br />N <br />~ <br /> <br />SUMMARY (Continued) <br /> <br />region. These modified projections are designated as the regionally inter- <br />preted OBERS projections (RI OBERS) and are the basis for the framework <br />plan. This plan is described in detail, then is followed by alternative <br />plans that reflect emphasis on different uses for the available water sup- <br />plies and resources. The alternative p1.ans are identified as: <br /> <br />1. States' alternative to the framework plan (6.55 million <br />acre-foot) level of development, <br /> <br />2. States' alternative at the 8.16 million acre-foot level of <br />development, and <br /> <br />3. States' 'alternative for water supply physically available <br />at site in the region (9.44 million acre-feet), <br /> <br />Comparisons of the framework plan and alternate levels of development <br />are shown in the table on the following page. <br /> <br />Program costs borne by the Federal Government for the framework plan <br />would total about $3 billion for the 55 years for installation; annual <br />OM&R (operation, maintenance, and replacement) costs would increase to <br />about $48 million by 2020. Non-Federal entity costs would total $10 bil- <br />lion for installation by 2020, with OM&R costs increasing to over $646 <br />million annually, particularly for thermal-electric power and recreation. <br /> <br />Time Water de- Associated Total de- <br />frame velopment development velopment <br /> Installation cost in $1,000 <br />1966-1980 1,190,300 2,700,840 3,891,140 <br />1981~2000 1,074,350 5,982,310 7,056,660 <br />2001-2020 658,780 1,3~7,680 2,056,460 <br />1966-2020 2,923,430 10,0 0,830 13,004,260 <br /> <br />All proposed levels of development meet the requirements of OBERS <br />projections and use the available resources of the region in varying de- <br />grees, It appears that the commitments of the Colorado River Compact can <br />be met, and except for local shortages during low streamflows, on-site <br />demands can be met for the 6.55 MAF development level. At the two higher <br />levels, augmentation will be required. <br /> <br />Land and mineral resources exist in sufficient quantity to meet all <br />projected levels of development. With minor exceptions, hunting and fish- <br />ing needs will be met. <br /> <br />ii <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.