My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03879
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03879
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:52:36 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:01:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/15/1922
Author
Colorado River Com.
Title
Proceedings of the Hearings on the Colorado River Development before the Colorado River Commission March 15, 16, 17, 1922 Phoenix
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
312
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />., <br /> <br />"If the L\eclamationService recommendations ~re carried <br /> <br />out, they w01;ld build the Boulder Car::yon Dam. turning the power <br />over to private enterprise. The power plant would be on the <br />Hevsd!: side, ani HevG.de would benefit from all the construction <br />activities ~nd' an im])ortant increase in her taxable wea.lth. No <br />one in Nevada can be blamed for seeking in every legi tir.1ate way <br />to heve the Reclamation Service program carried out. <br />"It is quite plain that Arizona and California will use <br />~racticslly ~ll the power to be r-enercted by the river develop- <br />ment for 30me thle to come, and [,11 the neVi land to be reclaimed <br />ES a result of the river development will be entirely within <br />their borders. Also, it is very plain that Arizona and Cslif- <br />_ ornis will eveotUblly pay all the bills oovering the cost of the <br />development, no m~tter how inefficiently or poorly the project <br />is deve1o~ed from their standpoint. Is it not evident that <br />Arizona and California clone should be the high contracting part- <br />:ies? <br /> <br />"Any inportent develo:!lment undertaken by tllne Reclamation <br />Service must. of oourse, be approved by Conrre66 and the Senate. <br />In ihe Senate all the other states of the basin have equal rirhts <br />wi th Arizona End California. \Iith ~ll these other states having <br />their own individual interestl3 to champion, can Arizona and <br />California expect that their very 1mllortant and pEramount interests <br /> <br />P. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />\ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.