Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.) therefore, be in Arizona and he.If in Nevada. so it may be stated <br />that 90 per oent of all the power projects that vd1l eventually <br />be developed in the canyon are in Arizona. Done of the Colorado <br />Hive"- power pro,jects ~_re in California and the closest one to <br />her border is 70 miles distant. <br />"Hatm'aIIy Arizona looks upon this great- resource exactly <br />the :Jan,e as all the other st<.tes look' upon Nature's resources <br />that hap,en to lie within their boundaries. Arizona natur_ally <br />ex~eots to ,rofit from the low cost power to be ~ade available <br />to her industries and by her increased acreage of irrigable <br />lands. Ari:sona has no no_tion of e:rG.bbing the cc'nyon's power and <br />reserving it to her own future USe. Arizona expects California <br />and any of the other st<.tes desiring power, to have &11 they oan <br />use b.nd to establish priorities in its use until finc,lly the can- <br />yon is fully developed. <br />"'i'he State of Arizona naturally expects to benefi t from the <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />power delivered beyond her boundaries to the o",tent of an ec;uit- <br />able tax on the project furniShing it, tl1e same as other states <br />bene~i t from the Shipment of cOllUlloili ties manufactured within <br />their con~ines to points outside. <br />'''l'he de....elopment of the Colo:ratlo River power project will <br />not add any ir~ifable land to the other five states, parts of <br />which lie wi thin the Colorado Ri ITer basin. Also, none of these <br />states are now much interested in the possibility of receil7ing <br /> <br />1'. <br /> <br />. <br />