Laserfiche WebLink
<br />f. C" . 3 [J '" <br />UU.1 ..... <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />to prevent wasteful use, undue Interference with existing wells, or <br />substantial interference with existing rights to appropriate surface <br />water. <br /> <br />Two States -- Kansas and Nevada -- declare that It Is an express <br />condition of each appropriation of ground water that the right relates <br />to a specific quantIty of water and must allow for a reasonable lowering <br />of the static water level at his point of diversion resulting from later <br />appropriations. A Wyoming declaration Is worded differently but expresses <br />the same principle. On the other hand, the idaho statute declares that <br />early appropriations of ground water shall be protected In the maintenance <br />of reasonable ground water pumpln9 levels as may be established by the <br />State Reclamation Engineer. Washington forbids the Issuance of permits <br />to withdraw wat2r beyond the capacIty of the formation to yield water <br />withIn a reasonable or feasible pumping 11ft In case of pumping develop- <br />ments, or a reasonable or feasIble reductIon of pressure In case of <br />artesIan developments. <br /> <br />The Utah statute accords to a Junior ground water appropriator the <br />right of replacement of water, with approval of the State Engineer, In <br />the event that his project may impair a senior right. The nonappropriatlon <br />statute of HawaiI contains a provisIon along the same lInes. <br /> <br />Preferred uses of water <br /> <br />Preference In use of water Is mentIoned In some statutes, domestic <br />use bel ng at the head of each 11 st. For e::amp 1<1, one of the correcti ve <br />control provisions that the Oregon State Engineer may Include In his <br />order declaring the exIstence of a critical ground water area Is the <br />accordIng of first preference, without regard to prIorities, to domestic <br />and livestock purposes, followed by other benefIcial uses In such order <br />as he deems advisable under the circumstances. <br /> <br />Chanqes In exercise of qround water rlqhts <br /> <br />A number of the ground water statutes authorl ze an approprl ator to <br />change the locatIon of his withdrawal of water, place of use, and use of <br />the water without loss of prIority, wIth the approval of the State admin- <br />Istrative agency. Changes would be conditioned on no resulting enlarge- <br />ment of the appropriation or ImpaIrment of other rights. <br /> <br />Determination of qround water rlqhts <br /> <br />As In the case of surface streams, administration of appropriative <br />rl9hts In the common water supply Is facilitated by and under some cir- <br />cumstances dependent upon a determination of relative priorities of the <br />several claimants. Such determinations may be solely court adjudica- <br />tions, or they may be special procedures in which administrative and <br />judicial functions are combined. Surface stream appropriation statutes <br />of most Western States contaIn procedures in which the State admInistra- <br />tive agency is Involved In some way. <br /> <br />- 6 - <br />