Laserfiche WebLink
<br />20. <br /> <br />21. <br />plans. <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />~. <br />_J. <br /> <br />24. <br /> <br />25. <br /> <br />26. <br /> <br />27. <br /> <br />28. <br /> <br />OOlo-'t2 <br /> <br />\8 <br /> <br />Listing IS separated from other events. [~] <br /> <br />\9. <br /> <br />Evaluate recoverabilitv separatelv from listing [0] <br /> <br />Need to Improve the quality of science used under the ESA <br />- peer revIew <br /> <br />No more moving targets for recovery. Need mandatory deli sting critena in recovery <br /> <br />F ACA needs to be amended or repealed. <br /> <br />ESA processes need to be streamlined. <br /> <br />Failure to involve state fish and wildlife agencies in ESA sCIence. <br /> <br />Federal policies published in regulations have not been implemented. <br /> <br />Affected stales do not have a seat on recovery teams. <br /> <br />Negative impacts of interstate management of resources are not considered. <br /> <br />Section 6 funding does not accomodate discretionary uses. <br /> <br />29. US F&WS and NMFS ability to transfer funding burden to other agencies. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />30. Policies are selectively implemented. <br /> <br />31. States can't get feds to act. <br /> <br />32. Federal biologists are not answerable to a single agency. <br /> <br />33. Administrative methods may be inadequate to achieve goals. <br /> <br />34. Need to develop mandatory process to consult with states. <br /> <br />35. Cooperation and coordination among affected state agencies needs to be improved <br />regarding ESA implementation (federally mandated or state-defined?) <br /> <br />36. Federal administrative processes may be inadequate. States need to become more <br />powerful. <br /> <br />37. States may lack their own tools for solving problems. <br /> <br />38. ESA is litigation-driven. <br />