Laserfiche WebLink
<br />00lG19 <br /> <br />WATER MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM 1994 <br />The Effect of the Endangered Species Act on Western Water Management: <br />Improving ESA Implementation <br /> <br />Cosponsored by the Western Slates Water Council. the Western Governors' Association. <br />and the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies <br /> <br />Repon on the October 5-7, 1994 Symposium at Grand Junction, Coloradol <br /> <br />OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY <br /> <br />I. BACKGROUND <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />The Endangered Species Act (ESA) originally became law in 1973. Its goal and methods were <br />unparalleled in United States history, embodying our Nation's commitment to end the extinction <br />of species, still occurring at an unprecedented rate, One of the ESA' s earliest successes was the <br />preservation of the bald eagle, symbol of this Nation. Since that time, many other species have <br />been preserved through the efforts of federal agencies, states and private persons under the ESA, <br /> <br />The history of the ESA has not been an unqualified success, however. Although few would <br />quarrel with its goals, the severe and sometimes draconian measures employed to secure those <br />ends, and the sometimes limited success of such measures, have engendered sharp criticism of <br />the act. From the western states' perspective, one of the most critical failings has been the <br />federal government's often inflexible and autocratic approach to listing and recovery planning. <br />States have been given only limited opportunities to fashion the remedies required under the <br />ESA, yet have borne a major share of the recovery burden and have been required to dedicate <br />significant state and private resources toward the recovery of listed species. <br /> <br />For member states of the Western States Water Council, these concerns have been magnified by <br />the fact that state water allocations can be significantly impacted by ESA decisions to protect <br />aquatic species, These impacts and possible remedies were identified in a paper prepared by <br /> <br />Ilbis report constitutes a compilation of the presentations, as well as a summary of the <br />proceedings and an overview of the background leading up to the symposium. While every <br />effort has been made to accurately reflect the proceedings, the staff of the WSWC assumes <br />responsibility for any errors made in summarizing and synthesizing the discussion and <br />presentations. lbis report sununarizes only the symposium proceedings and its working groups' <br />recommendations and is not an attempt to characterize formal positions of the Western <br />Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, the Western States Water Council, the Western <br />Governors' Association. or the members of these organizations. <br />