Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.I <br /> <br />'-.- <br /> <br />power releases to meet generation requirements, or demands which <br />draw from upstream reservoirs and move water through the reservoir. <br />There also may be spills from the reservoirs. Evaporation, bank <br />storage change, and power production are cakul'ated each time water is <br />moved through a reservoir. <br />When calculations have proceeded through the last sequence point <br />of the 'last node, flo'W8 are in balance throughout the entire basin. Sa- <br />linities are then computed throughout the .system 'by a mass balance <br />accounting procedure. Computations are then complete for the monthly <br />time frame. <br /> <br />Before calculations are started lor the next month, hydrology in- <br />'puts {or the new month are updated Irom the tempor'ai'y hydrology file. <br />'ll it is'the beginning of a new year. demand and/or reservoir operational <br />input data are updated. Simulation of basin operation for the new monthly <br />time frame is then repeated. This process is 'repeated through the final <br />month of the last year specified in the input data. <br /> <br />Special Colorado River Basin Features <br /> <br />Several features have been incoporated into the general river <br />basin model to reflect specific Colorado River operations. These in- <br />clude use of snowmelt-runoff forecasts for January.July reservoir <br />operations, distribution of water between the Metropolitan Water <br />Db.trict of California (MWD) and the Central A;rizona Project (CAP). <br />water splitting between the Upper and Lower Basins and storage re- <br />quirements of the Upper Basin described in section 602.(a) of Public <br />Law 90-537., and flood opt:rations. <br />The model has a procedure to provide a forecast of ,spring runoff <br />with the same error properties as actual forecasting during actual opera'- <br />tion. ]n the model, the spring runo!! (from the month under considera- <br />tion through July) is summed from the disk tile containing one year of <br />hydrology data. An error- term is applied each month which reflect. <br />the historical accu~acy of the forecast in that month. l'hu.', in any <br /> <br />15Z <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />----Sll <br /> <br />month the flow used as the forecasted value will be high or low to the <br />same degree as actual forecasted flows are in field operations. <br />The legal constraints which govern the flow of water ,between the <br />Upper and Lower Basins are incorporated in the model through a spe- <br />cial subroutine. This aspect of the basin operation uses the forecast <br />flows to determine the monthly-release irom Lake Powell and Lake Mead. <br />Before the Upper-Lower Basin analysis is run, the Upper Basin resel'... <br />voirs are analyzed and their rule curves established. <br />To determine whether Powell will release more or less than the <br />normal 8.2.3 million acre.feet (10,151. 71 million cubic me,ters) (from <br />a monthly schedule). 'an estimate is made of Powell and Mead contents <br />ior the upcoming October. The forecasted inflow to Lake Ppwell (from <br />the current month through July) plus the average August and September <br />inflow forms the expected total Powell inflow. The total release Irom <br />Powell expected through September is calculated as B.2.3 MA.F minus <br />the amount delivered up to the current month. The October Powell <br />contents are then the current contents plus the expected inflow. minus <br />the planned releases. Similarly. the October contents oi Lake Mead <br />can be estimated from the current contents plus expected inflow (same <br />as Powell release's plus gain between Powell and the Grand Canyon <br />gage) minus the planned releases. <br />Once the October contents of Lake Mead are estimated. a Lower <br />Basin shortage or surplus may be declared. If Mead's ending water <br />surface elevation exceed 1190 feet above sea level (362..7 meters). <br />water above that level is declared surplus and distributed to the Central <br />Arizona Project (CAP) and the Metropolitan Water District 01 California <br />(MWD). II Mead is below elevation 112.4 (342..6 meters), a shortage is <br />declared and CAP is reduced below its normal demand. Between eleva_ <br />tions 1124 and 1190. the normal release pattern associat.ed with an <br />8. Z3 MAF/year total release is followed. The declaration of a. shortage <br />or surplus in the Lower Basin does not depend upon the status. of Lake <br />Powell. However, water splitting between Powell and Mead may in... <br />crease the supply to the Lower Basin and affect the declaration. <br /> <br />153 <br />