My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03823
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03823
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:52:20 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:00:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8135.300
Description
Ditch Companies - Catlin
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/29/1976
Author
D Helton R McCabe
Title
Catlin Transfer Plan and John Martin Permanent Pool Operation
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />'0692 <br />.....Precipitation should not be deducted from gross <br />evaporation to estimate net evaporation. In this <br />proposal. the net evaporation rate would be calcu- <br />lated on a daily basis by deducting the measured pre- <br />cipitation from the reservoir evaporation rate. The <br />reservoir evaporation rate would be calculated by <br />applying the proper pan coefficient to the measured <br />pan evaporation rate. According to the U.S. Weather <br />Bureau?, the pan coefficient that should be applied <br />at John Martin Reservoir is 0.687. <br /> <br />.....The additional storage in the reservoir would reduce <br />the amount of active bank storage and, thereby, injure <br />the Fort Bent Ditch Company. This is because water <br />coming out of bank storage after the reservoir is <br />emptied supplies part of the Fort Bent's first priority. <br /> <br />The State agrees the permanent pool would reduce the <br />amount of "active" bank storage but does not believe <br />this will cause injury to other water users. Reducing <br />the amount of active bank storage would not reduce the <br />total amount of storage; it would cause the water in <br />question to be stored as conservation storage and avail- <br />able for distribution under the terms of the Arkansas <br />River Compact. <br /> <br />If injuries would occur, they could be eliminated very <br />easily. The additional water that formerly would have <br />gone into bank storage and that would have drained back <br />into the Arkansas River after the conservation pool was <br />emptied can be evaluated and credited to the permanent <br />pool when water is being stored in the conservation pool. <br />This water can be released after the conservation pool <br />is emptied. <br /> <br />.....All seepage losses attributable to the permanent pool, <br />including those resulting from the additional head, <br />should be charged against the permanent pool. <br /> <br />The State believes that the permanent pool will not cause <br />an appreciable increase in seepage from the reservoir. <br />If it would, adjustments to the reservoir release rate <br /> <br />-31- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.