Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />OC1820 <br /> <br />Table 7.2 Annual peak discharges used in incipient motion analyses <br /> <br />Incipient Motion Site I Incipient Motion Sites 2-6 <br />Qu = 364 cfs Q,OI = 457 cfs <br />Q" = 541 cfs QI , = 675 cfs <br />Q2 = 650 cfs Q, = 808 cfs <br />Q, = 913 cfs Q,=1120cfs <br />Q,O - 1080 cfs QIO - 1330 cfs <br />Q" - 1290 cfs Q21 - IS 10 cfs <br />Q,o - 1440 cfs Q,o - 1750 cfs <br />Q71 - 1534 d's Q75 - 1 864 cfs <br />QlOo - 1580 cfs QIOO - 1920 cfs <br /> <br />7.2.2. In-Channel Discharges <br /> <br />The primary component of flow influencing bed material transport in cobble and gravel <br />bedded streams, such as the Upper Arkansas, is the portion of flow contained within the <br />channel banks. Overbank flows arc typically capable of only transporting sand and finer <br />materials, except when flows concentrate in relic channels. Therefore, it is important to <br />correctly identify the discharge amount contained within the bank boundaries once <br />overtopping and flooding has occurred. <br /> <br />Flows determined using the Log-Pearson III flood frequency analysis address the total <br />discharge being conveyed through the river system; however, as stated, it is necessary to <br />determine the discharge contained within the main channel banks. Flows influencing bed <br />material entrainment and transport may be elevated above the banks, but do not include <br />overbank flows. Therefore, comparisons of floodplain versus in-channel percentages of <br />flow were used to ascertain those discharges conveyed within the channel that influence <br />bed material transport. <br /> <br />, <br />I <br /> <br />Two separate HEC-RAS hydraulic models were used to evaluate discharges confined to <br />the area between the channel banks. The first model used was a reach-based model <br />developed from cross-section data surveyed at each of the six 1M sites. The second <br />model was the floodplain analysis model developed by URS. <br /> <br />The reach-based model was used to determine reach average bankfull discharges and <br />their respective recurrence intervals. Bankfull determination was achieved by executing <br />the model for a wide range of discharges and then examining each cross-section <br />independently to identify when the banks were overtopped. In general, the top of bank <br />indicated in the cross-section survey was used as the reference point for bankfull. <br />However, when the top of bank was not a good indicator of bankfull discharge, other <br />indicators were used, including location, type, and condition of vegetation; and the <br />highest elevation on interior point bars. . Once bankfull flows for each cross-section <br />within a reach were identified, the cross-sections with the highest and lowest overbank <br />discharges were eliminated and all remaining discharges were averaged. Calculations <br /> <br />May 7. 1999 <br /> <br />Fluvial Geomorphological Assessment <br />Upper Arkonsas River <br /> <br />Page 53 <br />