My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03817
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03817
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:52:18 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:59:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8102
Description
Arkansas River Basin Basic Hydrology
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
5/7/1999
Author
Inter Fluve Inc
Title
Fluvial Geomorphic Assessment of Upper Arkansas River Final Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />0:1813 <br />Downstream of Lake Fork, the quantification of effective discharge is dependent on the <br />period of record utilized. If the entire period of record is utilized (1964-1967; 1975- <br />1984; and 1990-1993), the 4% flow duration value is 900 cfs. These values include a <br />period of significant flow augmcntations prior to the Mt Elbert Conduit of 1982. If the <br />most recent recorded flows are utilized (1990-1993), thc 4% flow duration value is 550 <br />cfs, which has a recurrence interval of between 1 and 2 years (Chapter 7). Figure 6.5 <br />shows the number of days that each of these flows were equaled or exceeded. During the <br />recent 1990-1993 time period, the 550 cfs discharge was exceeded an average of 13 days <br />per year. Between 1978 and 1984, however, that discharge was exceeded an average of <br />50 days per year. This earlier time period includes the pre-Mt Elbert conduit years of <br />1978-1982, as well as relatively wet years of 1983 and 1984. Consequently, the 1978- <br />1984 time frame rcflects a period of active geomorphic adjustment of the Arkansas River <br />downstrcam of Lake Fork. <br /> <br />The 4% flow duration value derived for the Leadville gage for the period of record <br />(1968-1983; 1991-1996) is approximately 400 cfs, which has a return interval of less than <br />2 years (Chapter 7), During that time period, that discharge was exceeded over 30 days <br />per year in 1979, 1980, 1995, and 1996 (Figure 6.6). During 1995 and 1996, thc effective <br />discharge was exceeded a total of 68 days. Although these two years encompass 9% of <br />the total time frame evaluated, they are responsible for 23% of the days during which the <br />effective discharge was equaled or exceeded. The 1979-1980 time frame is very similar; <br />during those two pe'riods, 1979-1980 and 1995-1996, almost halfofthe effective <br />discharge events recorded were experienced. <br /> <br />6.5. Geomorphic Evolution <br /> <br />The geomorphic analysis shows that the project reach channel width has increased <br />between 9% and 37% since 1939. Split flow conditions persisted since 1939. From 1939 <br />to 1957, bendway migration rates averaged 2-5 ft per year, and bendway cutoffs <br />predictably occurred at radius of curvature/width values of2-3.5. In contrast, the 1959- <br />1997 time period was characterized by migration rates of 5-13 ft per year, and bendway <br />cutoffs occurred over a wide range of RcIW configurations. Prior to the completion of <br />the Mt. Elbert Conduit, peak and moderate flows were significantly higher downstream <br />of Lake Fork relative to post-conduit time frames. The occurrence of effective flows <br />through the reach depicts the 1976-1984 time frame as one of rapid geomorphic <br />adjustment, followed by additional channel forming flow periods in 1995-1996. <br /> <br />The results presented above indicate that the project reach has undergone progressive <br />widening through time, and this widening was in part driven by historic augmentations <br />and an associated increased frequency of channel forming flows. Flow increases due to <br />augmentations have been reduced since the Mt. Elbert Conduit was completed; flow <br />duration curves indicate that 1990-1993 channel forming flows are approximately Y, of <br />those of the late 1970'5. <br /> <br />In stable western gravel bed rivers, the channel forming flow is roughly equivalent to the <br />bankfull discharge (Andrews and Nankervis, 1995). In general, that flow occurs on the <br /> <br />May 7. /999 <br /> <br />Fluvial Geomorphological Assessment <br />Upper Arkansas River <br /> <br />Page 43 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.