Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TURQUOISE LAKE 1994 OPERATION <br />NATIVE INFLOW VERSUS RELEASE TO LAKE FORK <br /> <br />500 <br /> <br />450 <br /> <br />Ei <br />z <br />o 400 <br />'-' <br />w <br />'" <br />'" <br />w <br />"- <br />.... <br />w <br />w <br />~ <br />'-' <br />a; <br />" <br />S <br /> <br />350 <br /> <br />300 <br /> <br />250 <br /> <br />~ <br />9 200 <br />~ <br />w <br />'" <br />~ 150 <br />w <br />~ <br />~ 100 <br />'" <br />CJ <br /> <br />-- - ...-.. - .--' <br /> <br /> <br />50 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />APR <br /> <br />MAY <br /> <br />JUN <br /> <br />JUL <br /> <br />Total Inflow = <br />Total oulflow = <br />Percent reduction = <br /> <br />"23:-161.---- -.- <br />4,780 <br />79% <br /> <br />. - ~".G~g;8-~i;;-D~~.-=--Na~~e~~fl~~.1 <br /> <br />TURQUOISE LAKE 1995 OPERATION <br />NA TlVE INFLOW VERSUS RELEASE TO LAKE FORK <br /> <br />700 <br /> <br />Ei <br />z 600 " n - - - - --- <br />o <br />" <br />w <br />'" <br />IE 500 <br />"- <br />.... <br />w <br />w <br />~ <br />u 400 --------- <br />a; <br />" <br />S <br /> <br />100 - - ------- - . <br /> <br /> <br />..... <br /> <br />~ 300 <br />~ <br />~ <br />w <br />'" <br /><!i <br />w <br />:> <br /><( <br />>- <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />200 <br /> <br />- - -' <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />- - - Gag~ 8.~lo~- Da~- =-- N-at~~-i~fl;; I <br /> <br />Total inflow - <br />Total outflow::: <br />Percent reduction = <br /> <br />JUL <br />42;624"-----. , <br />10,744 i <br />75% I <br />.J <br /> <br />APR <br /> <br />MAY <br /> <br />JUN <br /> <br />Figure 3.6 Turquoise Lake operations: Native inflow vs. releases to Lake Fork, April- <br />July, 1994 and 1995 (BOR, 1999) <br /> <br />May 7. 1999 <br /> <br />Fluvial Geomorphological Assessment <br />Upper Arkansas River <br /> <br />Page 18 <br />