Laserfiche WebLink
<br />...,' <br /> <br />~; , <br />, <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />f <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />001053 <br /> <br />AVA MEASURE MUST BE OPPOSED <br /> <br />They feel that aoceptance of the authority prinoiple at this or <br />lilY other t:l!iDw1ll eventually lead to an extension of this method <br />of central hed federal onntrol. They know that effeotive amendments <br />to proteot tl13 equitable interest of the state in the WIll; ers of the <br />Arkansas River oauaot be aooomplished in the proposed aot. <br /> <br />The only alternative is substitute legislation whioh will aid <br />in a constructive way to provide for a reasonable development in all <br />parts of the basin. The New River decision, under whioh the <br />authority prinoiple gains strength~ the authority bills and present <br />federal legislation require oarefulstudy aDd oonsideration in order <br />that the appropriate substitute legislation may be proposed. To ~his <br />end the cOllllDittee appointed at the recent oonferenoe of Governo~. <br />is working. <br /> <br />But, for the reasoIlll herein stilted the Arkansas Valley Authority <br />bill and all similar legislation, in the interests of the state, must <br />be opposed. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />..5- <br />