My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03790
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03790
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:52:10 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:58:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.13
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
10/1/1998
Author
Secretary of Inter
Title
Report to Congress: Operations of the Glen canyon Dam Pursuant to the Grand Canyon Protection Act of 1992 (Water Years 1997 and 1998)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Concern over endangered species, particularly endangered Kabab ambersnail, prompted development of a U.s. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service biological Opinion in this federal action. A 2-3 October 1997 habitat and population <br />survey at Vaseys Paradise revealed that 29,8m2 of potential KAS habitat lay downslope from the 934 m3/s <br />(33,000 cfs) flood stage. Five habitat patches were predicted to be inundated and potentially scoured by the I <br />planned November Test Flow, but it was considered unlikely that the inundated vegetation would be completel:';'>~ <br />eliminated. The habitat in the flood zone was estimated to support approximately 181 KAS (less than 1% of the: <br />estimated total population), Immediately prior to the November Test Flow, the Arizona Game and Fish <br />Department salvaged habitat and 14KAS from the inundated zone an is presently hOlding that material at the <br />Phoenix Zoo. A GCMRC survey crew reported new sand and driftwood on the inundated habitat patches <br />immediately following the event. Although losing 14,4% of the flood zone habitat to scour, the Test Flow did <br />not completely eliminate vegetation in the habitat patches of concern. No impacts were anticipated or observed <br />on endangered southwestern willow flycatcher habitat. Impacts on endangered humpback chub were not <br />considered to be detectable, and hence no effort was made to monitor that species. <br /> <br />Conclusions <br /> <br />These preliminary results indicate that top-of-powerplant flows can be used to rebuild low-lying sand bar <br />plantforms, and result in little disruption ofterrestrial endangered species. A flow of this magnitude is probably <br />insufficient to create or substantially rejuvenate backwater habitats, which serve as nursery habitats for native <br />and non-native fish. Although some sand bars increased in area and volume, this flow may not have been of <br />sufficient duration to maximize sand bar rebuilding. <br /> <br />~~",:"'-'-!''i':~-,!;~":::''_J':~'_~':'l'1;!:~':i:1-rI'"'-.o{:''''''~'''!''~'''':~':,:~..,,-! I~'.:-..'_.'," .j',"'~ f~ .,. '",'.-r;, ''-;'.', -~,""'.'~ .'-- ,....,'-. '..:- -_.~-'-.. ..;-....:.........,-".... ",' . ~ ''-' . -_.~:,~-...:..., ,......~-'- . -, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.