My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03790
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03790
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:52:10 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:58:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.13
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
10/1/1998
Author
Secretary of Inter
Title
Report to Congress: Operations of the Glen canyon Dam Pursuant to the Grand Canyon Protection Act of 1992 (Water Years 1997 and 1998)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />:. <br /> <br />"" <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />J,~([ <br /> <br />-', <br />;') <br /> <br />from Lee Ferry, <br /> <br /> <br />The floods brought an unusually large amount of sediment from the Paria River drainage into <br />the Colorado River, estimated at over 2 million cubic meters in volume. Researchers felt that <br />this sediment would be quickly transported downstream and desired to carry out some type of <br />high release from the dam in order to move the sediment from the main channel into eddies <br />and channel margins where less sediment would be transported downstream. Since there <br />were no hydrologic or dam safety reasons to conduct another beach/habitat-building flow as <br />was the case in March 1996, a release at powerplant capacity was scheduled as a type of test <br />of the habitat maintenance flow described in the GCDEIS. <br /> <br />On November 4-5, 1997, a 48-hour release at powerplant capacity (30,600 cfs at the time) <br />was made. The average daily releases before and after the release were about 21,000 cfs; <br />thus, the test flow increased the river discharge by about 10,000 cfs, a 45 percent increase. <br />The river stage increased between about 1,5 feet to 3 feet depending on the location in the <br />Grand Canyon. The preliminary impacts of the high flow are described in a memorandum <br />from the GCMRC (see Appendix F). <br /> <br />L. <br /> <br />,',- <br />,~ .' <br /> <br /> <br />ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM <br /> <br /> <br />Section 1805(a) of the GCPA directs the Secretary to: <br /> <br />. . . establish and implement long-term monitoring programs and activities that <br />will ensure that Glen Canyon Dam is operated in a manner consistent with that of <br />section 1802. <br /> <br /> <br />Section 1805(b) of the CGPA states that: <br /> <br />Long-term monitoring of Glen Canyon Dam shall include any necessary research <br />and studies to determine the effect of the Secretary's actions under section 1804( c) <br />on the natural, recreational, and cultural resources of Grand Canyon National Park <br />and Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. <br /> <br /> <br />One of the key elements specified in the GCDEIS and ROD is an "Adaptive Management <br />Program." The AMP provides a process for incorporating science and recommendations <br />from a diverse group of stakeholders in the evaluation and management of future dam <br />operations. The AMP calls for the continued interaction of managers and scientists to <br />monitor the effects of current dam operations on the Colorado River ecosystem, and to <br />conduct research on alternative dam operating criteria that may be necessary to ensure <br />protection of resources and improve natural processes. <br /> <br />"'-,::'1 <br /> <br />The AMP, schematically characterized in Figure I on page 6, identifies the following entities <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.