Laserfiche WebLink
<br />td"Qr:) <br />{} fl ~, i),) , <br /> <br />2,5.4 Hydroelectric Generation Potential <br /> <br />2.5.4.1 A 2000 kw (7200 MJ) power plant under the conditions dIctated <br />by Alternative D would generate approximately 10 million kwh per year <br />(36 million MJ) at a cost per kwh of 24 mills. <br /> <br />2.5.5 Access Roads <br /> <br />2,5.5.1 Approximately 2100 feet (638 m) of highway relocation would <br /> <br />be required for Alternative D. A few minor access roads would be <br />required to get to and from the borrow areas located near the dam. <br />These roads may requ I re fill within the White River. The riprap <br />borrow area Is the same as for the other alternatives and would <br /> <br />require an access road approximately 1.7 miles (2.7 ~) long. <br /> <br />2.5,6 Applicants Proposed Mitigation Measures <br /> <br />2.5.6,1 Revegetation - The applicant proposes to revegetate all <br />borrow areas above the high water 1 ine after construction. <br /> <br />2.5.6.2 FI shery Facl11 ties - The outlet works would be des Igned <br />similar to the other alternatives to avoid entrainment of fish. <br /> <br />2.5,6.3 Additional Mitigation Measures - Mitigation measures are <br />discussed In detail in Chapter 5. <br /> <br />2,5.7 Comparative Cost <br /> <br />2.5,7,1 The estimated annual cost per acre-foot In 1980 dollars less <br />engineering and construction management for Alternative D would be <br />$119, A construction cost estimate breakdown may be found in Appendix <br /> <br />A, <br /> <br />27 <br />