My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03777
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03777
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:52:05 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:58:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.40.B
Description
Yampa
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
5/12/1995
Title
Development of Estimated Daily Flows Yampa River at Maybell
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Development of Estimated Daily FlolVs - Yampa River at Maybell <br /> <br />Evaporation, first fill and reservoir operation depletions were calculated for Yamcolo <br />Reservoir. The reservoir was built in 1980 and historical end-of-month storage records are <br />available starting from January of 1981. The evaporation depletion was computed as the <br />average surface area multiplied by the net evaporation rate. The first fill depletion was <br />assumed to be equal to the end-of-month content for January. 1981, Le., it was assumed that <br />the reservoir began storing water in January. 1981. Depletions from reservoir operation for <br />the month were computed as the current end-of-month content minus the previous end-of-month <br />content. Hence, the depletion is positive when the reservoir is storing water. and is negative <br />when the reservoir is releasing water. Monthly depletions from evaporation, first fill and <br />reservoir operations were then added together and dissagregated into daily values using the <br />quadratic spline interpolation scheme. <br /> <br />Evaporation and reservoir operation depletions were calculated for Stillwater Reservoir. <br />The first fill depletion was not considered in this case because the reservoir was built before <br />our study period began in 1950. An average pattern of end-of-month contents was obtained <br />from the recent historical end-of-month records from 1979 through 1990. This pattern was <br />then applied over the entire study period. The daily evaporation and reservoir operation <br />depletions were then calculated as described above. <br /> <br />Evaporation and first fill depletions were computed for all stock ponds in Districts 44. 57 <br />and 58 in existence during the study period. The surface areas and the date of appropriation of <br />the stock ponds were obtained from the Divisiun 6 Office of the State Engineer. From these, a <br />time series indicating how the surface areas increased over the study period from 1950 through <br />1982 was constructed based upon the assumption that the stock pond was built in the year of <br />water rights appropriation. Evaporation depletions for each month of the study period were <br />then computed as the net evaporation rate for the month multiplied by the surface area for the <br />year. First fill depletions were assumed to take place in the month of April when the surface <br />area increased from one year to the next. The first fill depletion amount was computed as the <br />reservoir volume corresponding to the increase in surface area using the area-volume <br />relationship for Stillwater Reservoir (this was considered representative of typical reservoirs). <br />The monthly evaporation and first fill depletions for the stock ponds were dissagregated into <br />daily depletion values, and then routed to the Maybell gage using the appropriate travel times. <br /> <br />River Flow Travel Times <br /> <br />The effects of river travel times are significant when daily depletions at points upstream <br />in the basin must be translated to the Maybell gage. Average travel times between selected <br />points in the basin and the gage reach were estimated for each month of the year using a <br />uniform flow assumption, channel geometries and slopes estimated from USGS quad maps, and <br />average monthly gaged flows at the Steamboat Springs and MaybeIl gages. The resulting <br />estimates were then used to develop daily routing factors to be used in translating estimated <br />depletions from their locations of occurrence to the Maybell gage. <br /> <br />Average travel times were estimated between: (I) the USGS gage on Yampa River at <br />Craig and the USGS gage on Yampa River near MaybeIl: (2) the USGS gage on Yampa River <br />near Steamboat and the USGS gage on Yampa River at Craig; (3) the USGS gage on Elk River <br />at Clark and the confluence of the Elk River and Yampa River: and (4) the USGS gage on <br />Yampa River above Stagecoach Reservoir and the USGS gage on Yampa River near <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.