My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03748
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03748
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:51:54 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:56:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.33.I
Description
15-Mile Reach (UCRBRIP)
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
2/12/1999
Title
Draft Colorado River Programmatic Biological Opinion (PBO) Endangered Fish Populatio Status Assessment
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />biological opinion: decreases or no change in populations may indicate that <br />additional depletions are not justifiable. <br /> <br />Examples <br /> <br />Colorado pikeminnow from the Upper Colorado River were used in the examples <br />described below because data are readily available to establish reliable <br />baselines for each of the three indices: adult population size: adult length- <br />frequency: and young-of-the-year. Similar assumptions could be made for the <br />humpback chub, as well. when sufficient data are available. <br /> <br />Individual criteria or threshold values were selected for each of the indices <br />by which the pikeminnow population response would be measured: however. these <br />could be modified, if new data suggest more appropriate value(s), . We did not <br />evaluate nor recommend a formula by which these three indices miqht be applied <br />in determi th need to ei onsult n, That is. whet <br />tree indir.es would be weiqhted diffprpntlv or equally. or if one. two, or all <br />three indices would hove to demonstrate a neqative response before <br />reinitiation would be required. <br /> <br /> <br />o{{vr <br />~ <br />1;1- <br /> <br />Adult Population Size <br /> <br />Catch per unit effort (CPE) data were collected for adult pikeminnow every <br />year from 1986 through 1997. Standard Error (SE) was computed for each of <br />these years, as well (Table 1). Figure 1 presents these data graphically. <br />where mean CPE values are represented by diamonds and SE by solid vertical 1- <br />bars_ In addition. for the years 1993-95. the adult pikeminnow population was <br />estimated at 600 (open squares) with a 95 percent confidence interval (CI) of <br />!250 (dashed vertical lines). <br /> <br />The basis for determining the nature of the population response (positive. <br />negative or neutral) is the relationship between the baseline population <br />estimate, !CI. and future population estimates, !CI. That is. if the future <br />Pop,!CI overlaps the baseline Pop.!Cl. a neutral response would be indicated. <br />If future Pop,!CI lies entirely above the baseline. a positive response would <br />be indicated. and if it lies entirely below the baseline. a negative result <br />would be indicated (Figure 1). For example, the baseline Pop.!CI is 600!250, <br />so a population response would be positive if the future value of Pop.-CI > <br />850 (600+250). while the response would be negative if the future value of <br />Pop.+CI < 350 (600-250). Future values of Pop.+CI ~ 350 and Pop.-CI ~ 850 <br />represent a neutral response. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.