Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />".[l2'I,Q <br />u tJ -1_... <br /> <br />i~~J <br /> <br />f~~ <br /> <br />18 so that a choice among alternatives will be facilitated. <br /> <br />The number <br /> <br />74~ <br />:~i~ <br /> <br />:~~,i<.';; <br /> <br />~~~ <br />~:!}~:~~ <br />~>-~:~ <br />,:..:S<- <br />~f~t;~ <br />~~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />i~!:5"~ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"'<<~ <br /> <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />~.. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />l:i[i1 <br /> <br />:....;-', <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Because planning staffs are limited, attention should be directed <br /> <br />2 to examination of those purposes which may have appreciable effects <br /> <br />3 on planning objectives. <br /> <br />The same rule should govern the considera- <br /> <br />4 tion of methods and techniques for estimating benefits toward objec- <br /> <br />5 tives. <br /> <br />Planning resources shall be devoted to consideration of those <br /> <br />6 methods and techniques that can reasonably be supposed to be impor- <br /> <br />7 tant or potentially important in plan formulation. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Each objective shall be explicitly considered if (a) the projected <br /> <br />9 plan can reasonably be expected to have a significant effect on that <br /> <br />10 objective, or (b) if national policy as directed by the President or the <br /> <br />11 Congress has expressed an interest in the effects of the plan on <br /> <br />12 specific objectives, or (c) responsible regional, State, or local <br /> <br />13 interests have requested an evaluation of the effects of the plan on <br /> <br />14 specific objectives. <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Formulation and Evaluation <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />Plan formulation is a decision-making process which involves <br /> <br />17 preparing alternative plans to achieve identified planning objectives <br /> <br />19 of alternative plans to be developed for each planning effort will <br /> <br />20 depend upon the comprehensiveness of the planning effort, the comple- <br /> <br />21 mentarity or conflict among objectives, the technical possibilities, the <br /> <br />22 available planning resources, and the extent to which the design of <br /> <br />;~j.:~ii <br />:.'.;'- <br />/--"-'.-:- <br />.'..." " <br />.._:;....:' <br />,_..-: ~, .' <br />..~;-.::.'?~~ <br />~:~:-.-f} <br /> <br />23 additional alternative plans can be expected to contribute significantly <br /> <br />24 to the choice of a recommended plan. <br /> <br />Each alternative plan will thus <br /> <br />;~~:~~.~.:~~ <br />,~-' <br />.'~'- ...... <br /> <br />.'~ .' <br />:::.-.." <br />!,\f;,;-';, <br />.'.-~ .':' <br />:-'--,:.;.-; <br />-.-,-.:.''; <br />{:';z';r<;z:"'~~"'S;'::..~)::'~G:"~?:rI{~':;':1;!'~;~?'';f1!~j~i~l\;~j~!~~~t.5~';~;~,.i:.'i;'0:'ft;iEfii;~};;.:'\'~.~;':.':;I~.::I~~~'~jt~;,'!;'t;.~;:.?t%'f::;g?f~"<f{~~i5~fjt;i~;::~~~~' <br /> <br />.-.. --:./-:::-.: ". . "/'-;.:' ,- <br />