My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03730
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03730
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:51:49 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:56:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.100
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agencies - Bureau of Reclamation
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1983
Author
BOR
Title
Grand Valley Salt Pickup Calculations - draft report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Ii'S' CHAPTER II <br /> <br />~ <br />CJl <br />vi <br />C::. <br /> <br />GRAND VALLEY RIVER BUDGET <br /> <br />unaccounted flow is due to errors in estimating budget components with <br /> <br />associated salt (i ..e., ground water outflow or streamflow), then ignoring the <br /> <br />discrepancy is the same as ignoring a salt outflow, which leads to an <br /> <br />underestimation of salt pickup. <br /> <br />A procedure has been developed to adjust the model to correct for <br /> <br />unaccounted flow. The adjustment scales the river inflows one-way and the <br /> <br />river outflows the other, such that the resulting unaccounted flow is zero. <br /> <br />The adjustment eliminates any ignored salt outflow. Of course, the exact <br /> <br />contribution of each of the inflows and outflows to the unaccounted flow is <br /> <br />still unknown, but since the quality of river and/or ground water outflows is <br /> <br />not greatly different from the quality of the river inflows, it makes little <br /> <br />.:...... <br />. ~:~- \: <br /> <br />difference. <br /> <br />The effect on the salt pickup of varying the amount of unaccounted flow <br /> <br />designated to each budget component depends on the TOS of that component. <br /> <br />The adjustment can be thought of as creating another outflow equal to the <br /> <br />unaccounted flow. The quality of this ficticious outflow is equal .to the <br /> <br />flow weighted mean of the component qualities. Therefore, the greatest <br /> <br />upward effect in salt pickup would result from applying all of the <br /> <br />unaccounted flow to the worst quality component, and inversely, the <br /> <br />greatest downward effect would result from applying all of the unaccounted <br /> <br />flow to the best quality component. The worst quality component in the State <br /> <br />Line budget that can possibly be responsible for the unaccounted flow is the <br /> <br />Colorado River near State Line. <br /> <br />The difference in the mean annual salt pickup between applying all <br /> <br />unaccounted flow to State Line, as opposed to 50 percent to inflows and 50 <br /> <br />II-12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.