Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~.-.>.' <br />i\l <br />"'1'. <br />,-',^ <br />,. <br />" <br /> <br />CHAPTER II <br /> <br />PIAN FORMULATIOO <br /> <br />,'I <br />;.:-" <br /> <br />A significant problem identified by SCS in the Tongue Creek drainage is <br />the inefficient use of a limited water supply. The SCS estimates that 30 to <br />50 percent of the water diverted to earthen ditches is lost to ditch seepage, <br />while overall on-farm irrigation efficiencies are presently less than <br />50 percent. Reclamation studies indicate that a seepage rate of more than <br />2.0 cubic feet per square foot of wetted perimeter per day (ft/day) would be <br />necessary to produce these 30- to 50-percent seepage rate values. This is <br />considered very high. <br /> <br />;:Ii! <br />'....'..j. <br />'. <br />l: <br /> <br />n <br />kJ <br /> <br />r.~ <br /> <br />The irrigation ditches convey water through permeable soils overlying <br />Mancos Shale. Seepage water contacting the Mancos Shale dissolves salts and <br />transports it to the stream system. Surface water diverted for irrigation <br />has a TOS concentration of less than 200 mg/L. <br /> <br />::.il <br />[j <br /> <br />;III'-lI <br />:i~ <br />~.j <br /> <br />Salinity concentrations of Tongue Creek return flows, measured by the <br />SCS, range from 1,300 to 6,500 mg/L. Salt contribution to the Gunnison River <br />from the Tongue Creek drainage is estimated by the SCS to be more than <br />45,000 tons annually. <br /> <br />According to SCS studies, approximately 50 percent of the salt <br />contribution is caused by excess irrigation water applications and that <br />irrigation management could reduce the salt contribution by 10,000 tons per <br />year. This reduction is associated with SCS on-farm management practices only <br />and does not include canal and lateral lining. <br /> <br />Hydrosalinity <br /> <br />Reclamation's study of the Tongue Creek drainage began with an analysis <br />of water quality grab samples and daily flow measurements at the Tongue Creek <br />gauging station located near Cory. The data collected between February 1976 <br />and March 1985 showed an average annual flow volume of 38,940 acre-feet and a <br />salt load of 44,500 tons. A water quality sU1llllary of Tongue Creek at the Cory <br />gauge is presented in Table 1. <br /> <br />');~.-<! <br />i:".!.. <br />,e: <br />i~~l <br /> <br />r:....... <br /> <br />r:) <br /> <br />,." <br />l-';'J <br />:-) <br />'.... ~ <br /> <br />:}~, <br /> <br />~- .~~ <br />f.~ <br /> <br />(.0.;<1 <br />i;;~ <br />,>>.& <br /> <br /><:;,:~ <br />fi1 <br />:&-01 <br /> <br />Month <br />January <br />February <br />March <br />April <br />May <br />June <br />July <br />August <br />September <br />October <br />November <br />December <br /> <br />Table 1 <br />Average TOS values from Reclamation <br />grab samples at Tongue Creek near Cory <br />(February 1976 to March 1985) <br />Number of <br />s,les <br /> <br />7 <br />9 <br />8 <br />8 <br />10 <br />9 <br />9 <br />9 <br />10 <br />6 <br />7 <br /> <br />Average <br />TDS <br />1,236 <br />l,200 <br />1,032 <br />752 <br />l,014 <br />941 <br />1,908 <br />1,970 <br />1,583 <br />1,390 <br />1,166 <br />1,240 <br /> <br />r."M <br />j,; <br />L. <br /> <br />~"- <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />~ "if) <br />Ol),- 9<1" <br />