My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03721
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03721
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:51:46 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:55:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.300
Description
Lower Gunnison Basin Unit - Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
4
Date
12/1/1989
Title
Colorado River Water Quality Improvement Program Lower Gunnison Basin Unit North Fork Area Preliminary Findings Report December 1989
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />!"I <br />;,:'.... <br />f: <br /> <br />~'I <br />:',. <br />~.< <br />" <br />, <br /> <br />,',,,. <br />f~ <br />.;;,:J <br /> <br />"i <br />~~:-- <br />~~ <br /> <br /><'1 <br />i':l <br />~.;~ <br /> <br />~:~1 <br />U <br /> <br />t~ <br />~.4 <br /> <br />f{'l <br />j .~.:.:l <br />~;~ <br />'<:>o~1 <br /> <br />P.:.'-~, <br />.', <br /> <br />...... <br />ii.'-' <br />1(..4 <br /> <br />f~-~! <br />f:~:! <br /> <br />~:.~~ <br />';.A <br />:;';;;.c <br /> <br />~-""-" <br /> <br />.':'~ <br />"""J <br />.",;..... <br /> <br />,.", <br />'" <br />~>-.q <br />bl <br /> <br />~~ <br />0~' <br />;&;1 <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />CHAPTER I I <br /> <br />PIAN FORMULATIOO <br /> <br />land. The Smith Fork Project encompasses a major portion of the SSA. The <br />area was selected for study because of the degraded outflow water quality and <br />the knowledge that nearly all irrigation water is imported into the basin, and <br />is therefore quantifiable. <br /> <br />The majority of irrigation supplies are imported from the Smith Fork <br />River via the Needle Rock, Crawford Clipper, and Grand view Ditches. All <br />ditches are privately owned and operated except for the Aspen canal which is a <br />feature of the Smith Fork project. Crawford Reservoir on Iron Creek stores <br />Smith Fork diversions to provide supplemental water when natural river flows <br />are depleted in late summer. <br /> <br />In addition to providing irrigation deliveries these ditch systems also <br />provide stockwater to area farms and ranches during the nonirrigation season. <br />Therefore, this subarea was analyzed as a candidate for irrigation delivery <br />system lining and winter water replacement. <br /> <br />Grand view Mesa is an undulating plateau which slopes to the northwest <br />and is cut by small drainage channels. The soils are largely formed from <br />residual Dakota Sandstone weathered in place. Depths range from 2 to more <br />than 5 feet with textures ranging from clay to clay loam. The reddish-brown <br />mesa topsoil varies from 1 to l2 inches in depth and is underlain by a pale <br />brown, highly calcareous subsoil. Some residual Mancos Shale overlies the <br />Dakota Sandstone to the north near the outlets of Alum and an unnamed gulch. <br /> <br />Land in the Cottonwood Creek drainage is generally quite broken with <br />irrigable area located on terraces adjacent to the stream. Predominant soils <br />include residual and recent alluvial soils derived from decomposed shale. The <br />residual soils are heavy textured clay and are of relatively poor quality. <br />More recent alluvial soils are weathered from Mesa verde and Wasatch <br />formations and are of higher quality. <br /> <br />Smith Fork Project soils generally have been well leached. The average <br />total soluble salt content reported in 1959 was 0.1 percent with salts <br />uniformly distributed over the profile. Of the 24,950 acres classified, less <br />than 2 percent were rejected because of total soluble salt content above <br /> <br />0.5 percent. The average pH of the project land was 7.8 and no land was <br />rejected because of alkalinity content. The principal salts reported in the <br />Smi th Fork Project area were the sulfates and chlorides of sodium, calcium, <br />and magnesium. <br /> <br />The Grand view and Crawford Clipper ditch systems deliver water to <br />approximately 78 percent of the irrigated acreage within the SSA. The <br />Needle Rock system is composed of systems on the east and west sides of <br />Cottonwood Creek. All of these systems are capable of direct diversion from <br />the Smith Fork River. The Al and A2 are two small ditch systems that divert <br />water from the lower reach of Alum Gulch. The Aspen canal supplies <br />supplemental water from Crawford Reservoir. The above described delivery <br />systems were field inventoried to determine canal and lateral lengths, <br />diversion capacities, and the amount of lands served. Tables 3 and 4 present <br />the results of this field inventory. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />000937 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.