My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03702
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP03702
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 8:52:20 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:55:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8040.200
Description
Section D General Studies-Energy
Date
2/10/1974
Author
Steve Wynkoop
Title
The Denver Post-Scramble On to Develop Water for Oil Shale Projects
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. . <br /> <br />46 <br /> <br />Front-End Financing for Municipalities <br />The most critical problem identified by the Advisory Committee is the in- <br />equity of revenue sources and financial burdens on various levels of local <br />government (municipalities, counties, school districts) resulting in part <br />from jurisdictional limitations on taxing authority.* Inequalities exist <br />where municipalities normally receive a high proportion of the population <br />impacts from energy development, but have the least financial ability to <br />provide services and facilities for these new residents. Counties and <br />school districts also experience financial burdens, but are more likely <br />to have the borrowing capacity, and other resources resulting from a large <br />increase in the tax base, to deal with the impacts. <br /> <br />There is yet another area where the financial burden may not be distri- <br />buted equitably. Municipally owned power plants are exempt from local <br />property taxes, even when constructed outside the political and taxing <br />jurisdiction of the owning municipality. Thus, the area receiving the <br />impact from the facility may have no increased property tax base to help <br />pay for the additional burdens created. The law could be revised to re- <br />quire payments in lieu of taxes where significant additional burdens are <br />placed on areas otherwise unable to tax such facilities. <br /> <br />There are basically two methods for dealing with the problem of illadequate <br />financing for municipalities, and to a lesser extent, other local govern- <br />ment entities. One is to establish institutional mechanisms for a more <br />equitable sharing of the tax base and revenue sources among various levels <br />of government. The second alternative is to have funding readily avail- <br />able at the state level to assist impacted municipalities. The latter <br />alternative is discussed later in this section as a part of the need to <br />consolidate and expand funding sources at the state level. The Advisory <br />Committee believes that both approaches--encouragement of the pooling of <br />tax revenues and development of a significant state impact assistance <br />fund--are needed to deal with front-end financing problems. <br /> <br />*In addition to the difficultues experienced by municipalities when energy <br />facilities are located in the county, there are also potential interstate <br />problems. For example, Rangely is likely to experience major population <br />impacts from the two proposed oil shale plants in Utah. <br /> <br />. . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.