Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />numeric criteria and the plan of i.pl_entation. <br />establishment of salinity standards in 1975, the <br />conducted four triennial reviews in: 1978, 1981, 1984, <br /> <br />Since the <br />Forum has <br />and 1987. <br /> <br />o <br />en <br />Ol <br />food <br /> <br />Since the last annual Advisory Council report was submitted, <br />the Advisory Council met once on October 17, 1989, in San <br />Francisco, California. At that meeting, the Council received status <br />reports from the federal agencies involved in salinity control, <br />asked questions of ~l!l fedl!lra1 rl!lprl!lsentatives, and approved budget <br />recommendations for this 1989 annual report. <br /> <br />council Comments and Recommendations <br /> <br />The reports, "1989 Joint Evaluation of Salinity Control <br />Programs," December 1989, by the 8ureau of Reclamation and the <br />Department of Agriculture, and "1987 Review - Water Quality <br />Standards for Salinity - Colorado River System," by the Colorado <br />River 8asin Salinity Control Forum, describe the individual <br />salinity control projects and their status. Therefore, the Council <br />will make ,no attempt to repeat that information in this annual <br />report. ' <br /> <br />,. <br />. <br /> <br />General CQmments <br /> <br />:y <br /> <br />The Council appreciates the efforts of the Bureau of <br />Reclamation (Reclamation) and the Department of Agriculture (USDA) <br />relative to publication of the jointly prepared 1989 Evaluation <br />Report. The Council urges Reclamation to continue to consult with <br />the Forum and its Work Group regarding program. changes, results of <br />program evaluation, and revisions to the implementation schedule <br />for salinity control which are ,consistent with Forum policy and the <br />directives' of congress,. <br /> <br />Favorable hydrology during recent years has resul ted in <br />relatively good water quality in the lower river. If not for that <br />factor, the delays in construction of salinity control units that <br />have oCCurred would have had greater adverse effect on existing <br />water uses. However, with Basin runoff belo", normal, and reservoir <br />releases sufficient only to meet downstream delivery requirements, <br />it is imperative that the federal agencies vigorously pursue <br />adequate funding to carry out the proposed salinity control <br />activities as set forth in the 1987 Review and the 1989 Joint <br />Evaluation Report. <br /> <br />The council'urqes Reclamation and~SDA to closely coordinate <br />with the Forum during the preparation of the Forum's "1990 Review <br />- Water Quality Standards for salinity - Colorado River System" to <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />,t <br />