My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03640
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03640
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:51:23 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:53:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.114.J
Description
Dolores Participating Project
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
5/1/1984
Author
USDOI-BOR
Title
Planning Report - Concluding the Study on CRSP Power Peaking Capacity - Dolores Pumped-Storage Unit - Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />This report documents the investigation of the Dolores Pumped- <br />Storage Unit (Dolores Unit) of the Colorado River Storage Project Power <br />Peaking Capacity Studies. The Dolores Unit was one of several potential <br />peaking power projects recommended for additional study in a 1978 Recla- <br />mation report on potential sites for peaking power development in the <br />Upper Colorado Region.ll The. investigation examined the feasibility of <br />a pumped-storage peaking power facility on the Dolores River in south- <br />western Colorado. Even though the most feasible plan identified in the <br />current studies for the Dolores Unit had an estimated benefit-cost ratio <br />of 1.4:1.0, the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) determined that <br />further funding of the investigation by the Federal Government was not <br />warranted because additional peaking power capacity was not needed for <br />Reclamation project purposes. Consequently, Reclamation concluded <br />planning investigations on the unit at the end of fiscal year 1983. <br /> <br />Reclamation had earlier offered to continue studies if a non- <br />Federal participant would fund the remainder of the investigation over <br />fiscal years 1984 and 1985, A survey. was made to assess non-Federal <br />interest, and the Colorado Water Resources and Power Development Author- <br />ity (Authority) indicated it was interested in the study. The Authority <br />entered into negotiations with Reclamation, obtained the necessary <br />Federal Energy Regulatory Commission permit, and hired an independent <br />consultant to assist it in making a decision. The consultant reexamined <br />the power marketing demands, estimated the investigation and construction <br />costs, and confirmed the overall feasibility of the unit, The Authority, <br />however, decided not to fund the study because it felt the project power <br />needs were speculative and not clearly defined and because the unit <br />would be primarily for energy generating capacity, while the Authority <br />is mostly interested in water storage projects. <br /> <br />The plan identified in 1978 would use McPhee Reservoir, a feature <br />of the Dolores Project which is currently under construction, as an <br />afterbay and a potential reservoir on Dunham Point, a high mesa adjacent <br />to the McPhee Reservoir, as a forebay. This plan and three others using <br />alternate forebay sites in combination with McPhee Reservoir were exam- <br />ined during plan formulation but all were found to create unacceptable <br />fluctuations in McPhee Reservoir, a situation which would cause signifi- <br />cant adverse impacts on the fishery, recreation, scenery, and operation <br />of the reservoir. <br /> <br />Current studies indicate the most feasible plan would use a reser- <br />voir site on Plateau Creek above the McPhee Reservoir maximum water sur- <br />face elevation as the afterbay and a reservoir on Campbell Mesa as the <br />forebay. Studies originally identified a 1,OOO-megawatt (MW) power- <br />plant as being the most cost effective, but more recent investigations <br /> <br />11 U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Upper <br />Colorado Region. September 1978. Peaking Power Status Report, Salt <br />Lake City, Utah. <br /> <br />S-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.