Laserfiche WebLink
<br />*,~ <br />.~;~ <br /> <br />~~. ':~ <br /> <br />'.. <br /> <br />;i.; <br /> <br />'-'':: <br /> <br />-';.': <br /> <br />~.; <br /> <br />:. <br /> <br />. ; <br /> <br />:', <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />"',' <br />, <br /> <br />;:'.~ <br /> <br />'.<.~ <br /> <br />::ie <br />..; <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />"; <br />.' <br /> <br />,1 <br /> <br />,:~ <br /> <br />....'} <br />.. <br /> <br />'.; <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />UllU~"'J. <br /> <br />Channel Storage <br /> <br />Channel storage is the volume of water in a reach of a stream at any <br />given time. The introduction of a water wave results in an increase in <br />channel storage in the reach. The volume of water lost to channel storage, <br />however, is only a temporary loss because after passage of the water wave, <br />channel storage rapidly decreases, forming a part of the downstream flow. In <br />regard to the transportation of transmountain return flows d'lwn Fountain <br />Creek, changes in channel storage can have a substantial effect on the <br />quantity of return flows reaching the Arkansas River on any given day. <br />Although this effect was determined in the present study, channel storage was <br />not considered to be a permanent loss of transmountain return flows. <br /> <br />:- I <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />;. I <br /> <br />Evaporation <br /> <br />Transmountain return flows are evaporated either by (1) direct <br />evaporation from the stream surface or by (2) indirect evaporation through <br />soil surfaces of water in bank storage. Transit loss resulting from direct <br />evaporation was considered to be a permanent transit loss and waS included <br />in the present study, Only the increase in evaporation resulting from the <br />increase in stream width because of transmountain return flow was considered. <br />Transit losses resulting from indirect evaporation were not considered to be <br />substantial; moreover, these losses would, to some extent, be derived from <br />transmountain return flows permanently lost to bank storage. <br /> <br />Transpiration <br /> <br />Transpiration is the process by which water vapor escapes from the <br />tissues of plants and enters the atmosphere, For purposes of this discussion, <br />the actual use of water by plants for growth and development of tissue is <br />included in the process of transpiration. Only transpiration from naturally <br />growing riparian vegetation along Fountain Creek, much of which consists of <br />phreatophytes, was considered in the present analysis. The quantity of water <br />transpired by phreatophytes depends, to some extent, on the depth to water in <br />the alluvium. <br /> <br />.', <br /> <br />Introduction of transmountain water into fountain Creek increases head in <br />the stream and induces flow into the alluvium; this flow results in a head <br />increase in the alluvium and a decrease in depth to water below land surface, <br />Head increase in the stream because of transmountain return flow could be as <br />much as 0,5 ft; often it would be much'.iess. Head increases in the alluvium, <br />on the other hand, are considerably less than head increases in the stream. <br /> <br />l.... <br /> <br />.'-,' <br />., <br /> <br />Studies to determine the rate of water use by phreatophytes as a function <br />of depth to water below land surface indicate that very small decreases in <br />depth to water do not result in substantial increases of water use by <br />phreatophytes (Robinson, 1958, p. 18, 22). Therefore, tbe increase in <br />transpiration by riparian vegetation along Fountain Creek owing to a decrease <br />in depth to water resulting from head increases in the stream caused by trans- <br />mountain return flows was assumed not to be substantial. Again, some of these <br />losses would be derived from transmountain return flows that are permanently <br />lost to bank storage. <br /> <br />13 <br />