Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"~ .~. <br /> <br />;;'. ::: <br />,;",;..". <br /> <br />......'. <br />. (::,'. <br /> <br />~. . '":. <br /> <br />s" <br /> <br />:>>/ <br />.'.'.":'" <br /> <br />- " <br />'. ' <br />;,,~.. ",: <br /> <br />.., <br /> <br />"v' <br /> <br />",,'. <br /> <br />~:ii(~. <br />, <br />~:~>.; <br />:'-'-..( <br />;." <br /> <br />".". <br /> <br />.,' <br /> <br />',-', <br /> <br />: '.=-- <br /> <br />, , <br /> <br />'. ~. <br /> <br />'.' , <br /> <br />;~ . <br /> <br />oa02'iG <br /> <br />240 <br /> <br />>- <br />< <br />o <br />a: 200 - <br />uJ <br />c.. <br />o <br />z <br />o <br />() <br />\:: 160 - <br />a: <br />uJ <br />c.. <br />... <br />uJ <br />~ 120 <br />() <br />iii <br />::l <br />u <br />~ 80 <br /> <br />a: <br />< <br />uJ <br />>- <br />150 a: <br />uJ <br />c.. <br />... <br />uJ <br />uJ <br />U. <br />- 120 W <br />a: <br />u <br />< <br />u. <br />o <br />90 ~ <br />Z <br />< <br />CIl <br />:;) <br />o <br />60 i: <br />z <br /> <br />,-- <br /> <br />-= <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />~ _ _ _ _/A:'~AG' :"~'~W_'"' :"'00_ _ _ _ _ _ _ == _ _ ~ _: <br /> <br />;:: <br />0 - .-- <br />... <br />u. - -,-- l-- - <br />:E -.-- <br />< 40 - c-- <br />uJ - <br />a: <br />... <br />CIl <br /> 0 <br /> 1965 1970 1975 <br /> <br /> ;: <br /> 0 <br /> ... <br /> - 30 u. <br /> :;; <br /> < <br /> uJ <br /> a: <br /> ... <br /> CIl <br />1980 1985 <br /> <br />Figure 4.--Variation in annual streamflow at station 07105800 <br />Fountain Creek at Security, 1965 through 1985 water years. <br /> <br />The interactions of a substantially variable streamflow, streamflow <br />diversions, return flows, and ground-water withdrawals in the stream-aquifer <br />system result in a complex hydrologic system. Therefore; transmountain return <br />flows in Fountain Creek could sustain transit losses from several sources. <br /> <br />POTENTIAL TRANSIT LOSSES OF TRANSMOUNTAlN RETURN FLOW <br /> <br />.Six potential transit losses associated with transportation of trans. <br />mountain return flows down Fountain Creek were identified for the present <br />study: bank storage, channel storage, evaporation, transpiration, <br />inadvertent diversion, and ground-water withdrawal. A discussion of each <br />of these potential transit losses and its applicability to the present <br />study follows. <br /> <br />8 <br />